How Does Fluid Lite Work?
Fluid Lite (formerly Instadapp Lite) is a set of automated yield vaults that earn you amplified staking returns on ETH. The vaults work by staking your ETH through Lido to get stETH, then using that stETH as collateral to borrow more ETH and repeat the process — multiplying your staking yield through leverage. The strategy runs across multiple lending protocols (Aave, Compound, Morpho) and automatically rebalances to optimize returns.
TVL
$167M
Sector
Yield
Risk Grade
B-
Value Grade
C-
Core Mechanisms
Yield/Recursive Leverage/stETH Leverage Loop
Deposits ETH, stakes to get stETH via Lido, uses stETH as collateral on lending protocols (Aave, Compound, Morpho) to borrow ETH, restakes, and repeats — amplifying staking yield through leverage
Standard recursive stETH leverage strategy used across DeFi. The leverage ratio determines both yield amplification and risk amplification. Typically 2-4x leverage.
Yield/Vault Automation/Automated Rebalancing
NovelSmart contract vaults with automated rebalancing that adjusts leverage ratios and allocations across lending protocols based on market conditions and rate differentials
Automated cross-protocol rebalancing is the value-add over manual recursive strategies. Automation carries its own risks: bot failures, oracle lag, and MEV extraction during rebalances.
Yield/Multi-Protocol Routing/Cross-Protocol Allocation
Vaults split funds across Aave, Compound, and Morpho to optimize yield and manage risk, with dynamic allocation based on rate differentials
Multi-protocol routing provides diversification but compounds smart contract risk — each additional protocol adds attack surface.
Yield/Fee Structure/Performance + Exit Fees
20% performance fee on generated yield plus 0.05% exit fee on withdrawals from Lite vaults
Standard yield aggregator fee model. Performance fee aligns incentives but exit fee creates friction during market stress when users need to exit.
Governance/Token Model/Rebranded Governance
FLUID token (rebranded from INST) governs protocol parameters, vault strategies, and fee distribution
Instadapp rebranded to Fluid in December 2024. Governance token controls strategy parameters which directly affect risk levels for vault depositors.
Oracle/Price Feed/Multi-Oracle Dependency
Relies on oracle price feeds from each underlying protocol (Aave, Compound, Morpho) for collateral valuation and liquidation thresholds
Each underlying protocol has its own oracle setup. Oracle disagreements between protocols could cause inconsistent liquidation behavior during volatile markets.
How the Pieces Interact
At 3-4x leverage, a 5% stETH depeg would cause the vault's collateral to drop below liquidation thresholds across all lending protocols simultaneously. The vault would need to rapidly de-leverage, selling stETH into an already depressed market, amplifying the depeg and losses.
Funds are deployed across 3+ lending protocols simultaneously. A smart contract exploit in any single protocol could drain the portion of vault funds allocated there. The aggregate attack surface is the union of all dependent protocols' surfaces, not just one.
Rebalancing transactions rely on accurate oracle prices to make allocation decisions. During high-volatility periods, stale or manipulated oracle prices could cause the automation to make incorrect rebalancing decisions, moving funds into unfavorable positions.
During a stETH depeg event, the exit fee creates perverse incentives to delay withdrawal, leading to a rush for the exit when losses become unavoidable. First movers absorb the fee; late movers absorb both the fee and leveraged depeg losses.
Governance-controlled strategy parameters (max leverage ratio, protocol allocation limits) directly affect risk for depositors. Aggressive parameter changes to boost yield could significantly increase loss potential without depositors' explicit awareness.
What Could Go Wrong
- Recursive leveraged stETH strategy amplifies both gains and losses — a stETH depeg of 5%+ would trigger cascading de-leveraging across Aave/Compound/Morpho simultaneously
- Multi-protocol dependency chain (Lido + Aave + Compound + Morpho) means a vulnerability in any single protocol could drain Lite vault funds
- Automated rebalancing bots execute on-chain with inherent risks from oracle issues, gas spikes, and MEV extraction during high-volatility periods
stETH Depeg Triggers Cascading De-Leverage
ModerateTrigger: stETH depegs 5%+ from ETH due to a Lido validator incident, Ethereum consensus issue, or large stETH sell-off, triggering liquidation thresholds on leveraged positions
- 1.stETH/ETH ratio drops 5%+ due to market stress or Lido-specific incident — Vault's recursive leveraged positions approach liquidation thresholds across Aave, Compound, and Morpho
- 2.Automated rebalancing attempts to de-leverage by selling stETH for ETH to repay borrowings — Selling pressure on an already depressed stETH market deepens the depeg further
- 3.If de-leverage speed cannot keep up with depeg velocity, positions get liquidated by external liquidators at a discount — Vault depositors absorb leveraged losses: 3x leverage on 5% depeg = 15%+ loss before liquidation penalties
- 4.Exit fee discourages orderly withdrawal; remaining depositors absorb disproportionate losses — Late withdrawers face 20-30% losses; vault NAV permanently impaired
Risk Profile at a Glance
Overall: B- (30/100)
Lower score = safer