How Does Save Work?
A Solana lending protocol (formerly Solend) where you deposit crypto to earn interest or borrow against it. It holds $300M in deposits. Its B- grade reflects a near-catastrophe in 2022 when a single whale held 95% of pool deposits and a controversial governance vote tried to seize their funds.
TVL
$81M
Sector
Lending
Risk Grade
B-
Value Grade
C-
Core Mechanisms
Lending/Collateral Models/Over-collateralized
Algorithmic lending pools on Solana with over-collateralized borrowing across multiple asset markets
Core lending model follows Aave/Compound pattern adapted for Solana. Battle-tested through multiple market cycles including FTX collapse, though with significant stress events.
Lending/Interest Rate Curves/Kinked Utilization Curve
Kinked interest rate model with aggressive rate escalation above 80% utilization to incentivize repayment
Standard kinked curve model. During the June 2022 whale crisis, high utilization locked depositors out of withdrawals, demonstrating the model's limits under concentration risk.
Lending/Liquidation Mechanics/Fixed-spread Liquidation
Automated liquidation with fixed bonus for liquidators, plus account borrow limits introduced after the 2022 whale incident
Account borrow limits ($50M cap) were introduced post-crisis via SLND3 governance proposal. Limits reduce but do not eliminate concentration risk.
Lending/Oracle Dependencies/Multi-oracle with Fallback
Pyth Network price feeds as primary oracle source with fallback mechanisms for Solana assets
Relies on Pyth for price data. Solana oracle ecosystem is less mature than Ethereum Chainlink, introducing oracle latency risk during volatile periods.
Token Supply/Elastic Supply/Algorithmic Stablecoin
sUSD stablecoin launched as part of Save rebrand, backed by protocol-managed collateral strategies
Novel stablecoin launch by a lending protocol. sUSD adds significant smart contract surface area and collateral management risk. Untested in market stress conditions.
Staking/Liquid Staking/Reward-bearing LST
saveSOL liquid staking token providing SOL staking yield while maintaining DeFi composability
LST launch expands Save from pure lending into staking infrastructure. Introduces depeg risk and adds operational complexity to an already broad product suite.
Governance/Voting/Token-weighted Voting
SLND/SAVE token governance with on-chain proposal execution, historically controversial due to the June 2022 whale takeover vote
Governance integrity was severely tested in June 2022 when a proposal to seize a whale's funds passed with 90% of votes from a single wallet. Though reversed, it exposed fundamental governance concentration risks.
Incentive Programs/Points/Airdrop Systems
Dumpy.Fun — a memecoin shorting platform launched under the Save brand to attract users and generate fees
Ancillary product that diversifies revenue but adds reputational and smart contract risk. Memecoin shorting attracts high-risk users.
How the Pieces Interact
Despite $50M borrow limits introduced post-crisis, large accounts can still represent outsized share of pool deposits. A single whale liquidation can exhaust pool liquidity and create bad debt socialized across all depositors.
During mass liquidation events, utilization spikes above the kink point, causing extreme interest rate jumps. Borrowers face simultaneous liquidation and rate shock, while depositors are locked out by 100% utilization.
If sUSD is accepted as collateral in Save's lending pools and subsequently depegs, borrowers' collateral becomes insufficient. Bad debt propagates from the stablecoin product to the core lending business.
saveSOL's exchange rate depends on accurate oracle pricing. If Pyth's saveSOL price feed lags or is manipulated, borrowers using saveSOL as collateral may be incorrectly liquidated or may escape liquidation when they should not.
Governance must now manage risk parameters across lending, stablecoin, LST, and memecoin shorting products. Low SAVE FDV (~$15M) means governance power is cheap to acquire, while the surface area of governance decisions has expanded significantly.
What Could Go Wrong
- Historical whale concentration risk — a single account once held 95% of pool deposits, and concentration monitoring remains the protocol's critical vulnerability
- Newly launched sUSD stablecoin and saveSOL LST expand attack surface without extensive battle-testing
- Losing market share to Kamino and Jupiter Lend while maintaining legacy codebase from Solend era increases technical debt risk
Whale Concentration Triggers Cascade Liquidation
ModerateTrigger: A single whale account representing >20% of lending pool deposits faces liquidation during a rapid SOL price decline, overwhelming liquidator capacity and leaving the protocol with bad debt
- 1.SOL price drops >35% in under 4 hours, pushing the largest borrower position below liquidation threshold — Automated liquidation bots attempt to liquidate the position, but the size exceeds available on-chain liquidity for orderly liquidation
- 2.Partial liquidation creates cascading sell pressure on SOL collateral across Solana DeFi — SOL price decline accelerates, pushing additional Save borrowers underwater simultaneously
- 3.Solana network congestion from liquidation transactions delays further liquidations — Bad debt accumulates as positions go further underwater while liquidation transactions fail or are delayed
- 4.Depositors race to withdraw remaining funds from Save lending pools — Utilization spikes to 100%, remaining depositors are locked out, and interest rates spike to emergency levels
Risk Profile at a Glance
Overall: B- (32/100)
Lower score = safer