Is Blackhole CLMM Safe?
Risk Grade: C+ (40/100)
Blackhole CLMM is rated as elevated risk — multiple novel mechanisms and notable interaction risks.
Moderate risk — standard ve(3,3) DEX mechanics on Avalanche with inherent emission-dependency risk and low governance capture cost
Blackhole CLMM is a decentralized exchange on Avalanche offering concentrated liquidity, standard AMM, and stablecoin pools. It uses a ve(3,3) governance model where BLACK token holders can lock tokens to vote on which liquidity pools receive emission rewards. Built as a fork of ThenaFi, it also features Genesis Pools for new token launches. Its C+ grade reflects governance capture risk at low FDV and emission-dependent TVL sustainability.
TVL
$27M
Mechanisms
6
Interactions
4
Value Grade
D
Key Risks for Blackhole CLMM Users
The protocol's $68M in deposits is held up mainly by BLACK token emission rewards — if the token price drops, farmers leave and deposits could collapse like many similar projects before
With only $7M total token value, it is very cheap for a wealthy player to buy up voting power and redirect rewards to themselves at everyone else's expense
The code is forked from another project (ThenaFi) — any hidden bugs in that code are inherited, and Blackhole's own modifications add new potential vulnerabilities
Top Risk Factors
- •ve(3,3) tokenomics model creates complex emission-governance flywheel where veNFT holders control emissions — potential for governance capture at low cost given $7M FDV
- •ThenaFi fork introduces inherited codebase risk — any undiscovered vulnerabilities in ThenaFi propagate to Blackhole with potential modifications adding new attack surface
- •Concentrated liquidity positions face impermanent loss amplification when asset prices move outside selected ranges, with LPs potentially losing 100% of position value in one asset
How Blackhole CLMM Compares to Peers
Blackhole CLMM ranks #80 of 111 DEX protocols (below-median — riskier than average). At a risk score of 40/100, it's 6 points riskier than the sector average of 34/100.
Adjacent peers: VVS Standard (C+, 39/100) is ranked just safer, and Futarchy AMM (C+, 40/100) is ranked just riskier.
See the full DEX sector leaderboard or the Blackhole CLMM vs Futarchy AMM comparison.
Common Questions about Blackhole CLMM
Plain-English answers based on Blackhole CLMM's scores across Hindenrank's 8 risk dimensions. The highest-scoring (riskiest) dimension is Vitality Risk (6/10).
Has Blackhole CLMM ever been hacked or exploited?
Blackhole CLMM has had some operational issues or moderate incidents in its history. The track record dimension scored 6/15 — not catastrophic, but enough to flag. Look at the specific events and whether they were addressed by the team before drawing conclusions.
How much money is at stake in Blackhole CLMM?
Blackhole CLMM currently holds roughly $27M in user deposits. Smaller TVL means individual depositors carry a larger share of any loss event, and it can be harder to exit a position quickly during stress.
What's the worst-case scenario for Blackhole CLMM?
Hindenrank has identified specific collapse scenarios for Blackhole CLMM. The most prominent: "ve(3,3) Emission Death Spiral". The trigger condition is BLACK token price declines 50%+ causing emission incentives to become insufficient to attract LPs, triggering TVL withdrawal cascade. Reading through the full scenario list on the protocol page is the single best way to understand the actual failure modes — generic "smart contract risk" is rarely the thing that takes a protocol down.
Is Blackhole CLMM regulated or insured?
Blackhole CLMM has some regulatory exposure (4/10), typical of mid-sized DeFi protocols. There is no specific enforcement action on record, but the structure includes elements that regulators have flagged in similar protocols. No DeFi protocol carries FDIC-style insurance — even with low regulatory risk, depositors are not protected in the way bank customers are.
What are the biggest red flags for Blackhole CLMM?
Hindenrank's retail-focused risk audit flagged: The protocol's $68M in deposits is held up mainly by BLACK token emission rewards — if the token price drops, farmers leave and deposits could collapse like many similar projects before With only $7M total token value, it is very cheap for a wealthy player to buy up voting power and redirect rewards to themselves at everyone else's expense The code is forked from another project (ThenaFi) — any hidden bugs in that code are inherited, and Blackhole's own modifications add new potential vulnerabilities
Should beginners deposit into Blackhole CLMM?
Blackhole CLMM's C+ grade puts it in the elevated-risk band. This is not a beginner-friendly protocol. Anyone depositing here should treat the position as speculative and avoid concentrating significant savings in it.
How does Blackhole CLMM compare to safer DEX alternatives?
Blackhole CLMM is one protocol in Hindenrank's DEX coverage. The safest DEX protocols on the leaderboard tend to share three traits: a long incident-free track record, conservative mechanism design, and high-quality public documentation. Compare Blackhole CLMM against the full DEX ranking before committing capital.
For the full 8-dimension score breakdown, the radar chart, and dependency graph, see the Blackhole CLMM risk report.
Read the Full Blackhole CLMM Risk Report
This protocol has 2 collapse scenarios. 2 high-severity interaction risks identified. See the full mechanism classification, interaction matrix, and deep-dive recommendations.
View Full Report →Get risk alerts before it's too late
Weekly grade changes, downgrade alerts, and new protocol risk findings. Free.