Is Radiant Capital a Good Investment?

FValue
D+Risk
|Lending
Loading price data...
TVL$2M
FDV$8M
TVL/FDV0.28x
Risk GradeD+
Value GradeF

Value Accrual: Does the Radiant Capital Token Capture Value?

Radiant Capital scores F on Hindenrank's value accrual framework (7/100), indicating weak value fundamentals — limited fee capture, poor token distribution, or unsustainable emissions. Fee capture scores 2/25 — minimal, with virtually no protocol fees flowing to token holders. Token distribution is rated 0/25 (highly concentrated, posing material governance and sell-pressure risks), and emission sustainability sits at 1/25. The competitive moat dimension scores 4/25.

Scored as: Business
Fee Capture
2/25
Token Distribution
0/25
Emission Sustainability
1/25
Competitive Moat
4/25

Protocol Health: Is Radiant Capital Still Growing?

Radiant Capital's vitality risk score is 9/10 on Hindenrank's rubric (lower is healthier). This raises concerns about protocol vitality — Radiant Capital shows signs of declining activity, stagnant or falling TVL, or reduced developer engagement. Investors should monitor whether this trend reverses before increasing exposure.

GitHub: radiant

Risk-Adjusted View: Is the Upside Worth the Risk?

Risk-Adjusted Position

Avoid
High Value
Medium Value
Low Value
High Risk
High Risk Play
Risky
Radiant Capital
Medium Risk
Promising
Neutral
Weak
Low Risk
Blue Chip
Safe but Stale
Dead Money
See all Avoid protocols →

Radiant Capital sits in the Avoid quadrant — high risk (D+) combined with poor value accrual (F). From a fundamentals perspective, there is no compelling reason to hold this token. Both the risk profile and value mechanics work against the investor.

Risk Context

Radiant Capital carries a risk grade of D+ (62/100), classified as high risk — extreme novelty, critical interactions, unproven at scale. The protocol has 3 critical interaction risks that investors should monitor carefully. The primary risk factor is: Two major exploits in 2024: $4.5M flash loan attack (January) and $53M multisig compromise by North Korean hackers (October)

Read our full safety analysis →

Should you buy Radiant Capital?

Radiant Capital scores F on Hindenrank's value accrual framework, placing it among the bottom-tier Lending protocols. Fee capture scores 2/25 — minimal, with virtually no protocol fees flowing to token holders. Token distribution is highly concentrated, posing material governance and sell-pressure risks, and emission sustainability sits at 1/25. On the risk side, Radiant Capital carries a D+ grade (62/100), which is high risk — extreme novelty, critical interactions, unproven at scale. The combined risk-value position places Radiant Capital in the Avoid quadrant.

Radiant Capital investment outlook for 2026

With $2M in total value locked and FDV of $8M, giving a TVL/FDV ratio of 0.28, Radiant Capital's fundamentals do not strongly support the current valuation from a usage perspective. The competitive moat dimension scores 4/25, suggesting limited moat, leaving the protocol vulnerable to competitive pressure.Investors should weigh these fundamentals alongside market conditions and their own risk tolerance.

This analysis is based on cryptoeconomic fundamentals, not price prediction. It is not financial advice. Full methodology

Weekly Commentary

Pro

Week of March 12, 2026

Radiant Capital holds a D+ risk grade (62/100) following two major hacks: $4.5M in January 2023 and $53M in October 2024 via malicious multisig firmware attack. No material changes. TVL at $2.2M, down dramatically from peak. The protocol has implemented hardware-based signing requirements post-hack.

Related Lending Investment Analyses

Related Lending Safety Analyses

Investment analysis uses Hindenrank's value accrual framework across four dimensions: fee capture, token distribution, emission sustainability, and competitive moat. Higher score = better value accrual. Combined with our eight-dimension risk rubric for risk-adjusted positioning. This is not financial advice.