Is Renzo Safe?

|Liquid Staking
C

Risk Grade: C (46/100)

Renzo is rated as elevated risk — multiple novel mechanisms and notable interaction risks.

Moderate risk — large-scale restaking with proven depeg history. The April 2024 crash showed exactly how liquidation cascades unfold at scale

A liquid restaking protocol that gives you ezETH tokens representing your ETH earning extra yield through EigenLayer. It holds $3.3B in deposits and raised $25M. Its C grade is driven by a proven depeg disaster -- in April 2024, ezETH crashed to 0.2 of its ETH value, triggering $65M+ in forced sell-offs across DeFi.

TVL

$369M

Mechanisms

7

Interactions

5

Value Grade

D-

Key Risks for Renzo Users

1.

ezETH already crashed to 20% of its fair value in April 2024, wiping out $65M+ in leveraged positions across multiple lending platforms

2.

Withdrawals take days during market stress. If you need to sell fast, you are stuck selling at a discount on open markets

3.

The team picks which services your ETH is staked on. If they choose poorly and a service gets penalized, all ezETH holders share the loss

Top Risk Factors

  • ezETH depeg history — April 2024 depeg to 0.2 ETH ratio triggered $65M+ in cascading liquidations across DeFi
  • LRT leverage loops on lending platforms create CDO-like risk layering with liquidation cascade potential
  • Dependence on EigenLayer AVS slashing mechanics introduces inherited systemic risk

Risk Score Breakdown

Renzo's highest risk area is Interaction Severity (14/20). Here's how each dimension contributes to the overall 46/100 score:

Mechanism Novelty0/15
Interaction Severity14/20
Oracle Surface5/10
Documentation Gaps3/10
Track Record10/15
Scale Exposure5/10
Regulatory Risk2/10
Vitality Risk7/10

Read the Full Renzo Risk Report

This protocol has 2 collapse scenarios. 1 critical and 3 high-severity interaction risks identified. See the full mechanism classification, interaction matrix, and deep-dive recommendations.

View Full Report →

Related Liquid Staking Safety Analyses

Related Liquid Staking Investment Analyses

Ratings use Hindenrank's eight-dimension risk rubric. Lower score = lower risk. Grades range from A (safest) to F (riskiest). This is not financial advice.