Is Sanctum Safe?

|Liquid Staking
B-

Risk Grade: B- (28/100)

Sanctum is rated as moderate risk — some novel mechanisms, generally well-understood.

Moderate risk — powerful liquidity aggregation, but the pooled design means one rotten staking token can spoil the entire basket

A Solana liquid staking hub that pools dozens of different staking tokens into one diversified token (INF) and lets you swap between them instantly. It holds $1B in deposits after growing 4,900% in a year. Its B- grade reflects that mixing many staking tokens together means one bad token can poison the entire pool.

TVL

$1.2B

Mechanisms

7

Interactions

6

Value Grade

D+

Key Risks for Sanctum Users

1.

If any single staking token in the pool loses value, arbitrage traders will dump the bad token into the pool and take out good ones -- your share gets diluted with the toxic asset

2.

Instant redemptions use a reserve of 400,000 SOL. During a panic, early withdrawers drain the reserve and latecomers face a one-epoch waiting period

3.

Growing 4,900% in one year means the system has never been tested at this scale during real market stress

Top Risk Factors

  • Multi-LST Infinity pool aggregates risk from all supported LSTs; a single LST depeg can poison the entire pool through arbitrage-driven toxic asset accumulation
  • Reserve pool of ~400,000 SOL enables instant LST-to-SOL redemption but can drain rapidly during stress, leaving remaining holders with one-epoch withdrawal delays
  • Explosive 4900% TVL growth from 2024 outpaces battle-testing; protocol mechanisms are untested at current scale during a real LST depeg event

Risk Score Breakdown

Sanctum's highest risk area is Vitality Risk (6/10). Here's how each dimension contributes to the overall 28/100 score:

Mechanism Novelty5/15
Interaction Severity8/20
Oracle Surface0/10
Documentation Gaps2/10
Track Record3/15
Scale Exposure2/10
Regulatory Risk2/10
Vitality Risk6/10

Read the Full Sanctum Risk Report

This protocol has 2 collapse scenarios. 2 high-severity interaction risks identified. See the full mechanism classification, interaction matrix, and deep-dive recommendations.

View Full Report →

Related Liquid Staking Safety Analyses

Related Liquid Staking Investment Analyses

Ratings use Hindenrank's eight-dimension risk rubric. Lower score = lower risk. Grades range from A (safest) to F (riskiest). This is not financial advice.