Is Stader Safe?

|Liquid Staking
B-

Risk Grade: B- (29/100)

Stader is rated as moderate risk — some novel mechanisms, generally well-understood.

Moderate risk — well-audited liquid staking with standard mechanics, balanced by permissioned operator set and multi-chain complexity.

Stader is a multi-chain liquid staking platform with $323M TVL, offering ETHx on Ethereum and LSTs on BNB Chain, Polygon, and Hedera. Its B grade reflects standard liquid staking patterns with no novel mechanisms, backed by multiple audits from Sigma Prime, Halborn, and PeckShield, though the permissioned operator set and multi-chain complexity add moderate risk.

TVL

$325M

Mechanisms

5

Interactions

4

Value Grade

C-

Key Risks for Stader Users

1.

ETHx relies on oracle price feeds when used as collateral in other DeFi protocols. If these feeds lag during volatile markets, positions backed by ETHx could be incorrectly liquidated.

2.

Stader uses a permissioned set of node operators rather than allowing anyone to run validators, which means the team controls validator selection.

3.

During market stress, many users trying to unstake simultaneously could create redemption queue delays, potentially causing ETHx to trade below its fair value temporarily.

Top Risk Factors

  • ETHx exchange rate depends on oracle feeds for accurate pricing; a stale or manipulated oracle could cause incorrect liquidations when ETHx is used as collateral in external lending protocols.
  • Multi-chain deployment across Ethereum, BNB Chain, Polygon, and Hedera increases attack surface, as each chain integration introduces bridge dependencies and chain-specific risks.
  • Permissioned node operator set means Stader currently controls which validators run ETHx-backed nodes, creating centralization risk in validator selection.

Risk Score Breakdown

Stader's highest risk area is Vitality Risk (8/10). Here's how each dimension contributes to the overall 29/100 score:

Mechanism Novelty0/15
Interaction Severity6/20
Oracle Surface2/10
Documentation Gaps2/10
Track Record3/15
Scale Exposure5/10
Regulatory Risk3/10
Vitality Risk8/10

Read the Full Stader Risk Report

This protocol has 2 collapse scenarios. 1 high-severity interaction risks identified. See the full mechanism classification, interaction matrix, and deep-dive recommendations.

View Full Report →

Related Liquid Staking Safety Analyses

Related Liquid Staking Investment Analyses

Ratings use Hindenrank's eight-dimension risk rubric. Lower score = lower risk. Grades range from A (safest) to F (riskiest). This is not financial advice.