Is Stargate Finance Safe?

|Bridge
C+

Risk Grade: C+ (40/100)

Stargate Finance is rated as elevated risk — multiple novel mechanisms and notable interaction risks.

Moderate risk — most-used bridge with deep liquidity, but the 2-of-2 validator trust model and centralized post-acquisition governance are serious concerns

A cross-chain bridge that lets you move tokens between blockchains using shared liquidity pools, holding $345M in deposits. LayerZero acquired Stargate for $110M in 2025, dissolving the community DAO and centralizing governance. Its C+ grade reflects serious bridge security risks and the loss of decentralized oversight.

TVL

$8M

Mechanisms

7

Interactions

6

Value Grade

C+

Key Risks for Stargate Finance Users

1.

Two validator groups (DVNs) must both approve every cross-chain transfer. If both are compromised or collude, attackers can forge transfers and steal the entire $345M in liquidity pools

2.

LayerZero bought Stargate and shut down the community DAO. One foundation now controls bridge settings, validator choices, and fee structures with no community vote required

3.

The reward system that keeps pools balanced across chains can be gamed. An attacker who finds the right sequence of trades can systematically drain pool liquidity for profit

Top Risk Factors

  • DVN validator collusion (both whitelisted DVNs) can submit fraudulent messages and steal bridged funds
  • LayerZero acquisition dissolved Stargate DAO, centralizing governance under LayerZero Foundation
  • Unified liquidity pools across chains can be drained through algorithm manipulation of equilibrium rewards

Risk Score Breakdown

Stargate Finance's highest risk area is Interaction Severity (12/20). Here's how each dimension contributes to the overall 40/100 score:

Mechanism Novelty5/15
Interaction Severity12/20
Oracle Surface5/10
Documentation Gaps3/10
Track Record3/15
Scale Exposure3/10
Regulatory Risk3/10
Vitality Risk6/10

Read the Full Stargate Finance Risk Report

This protocol has 2 collapse scenarios. 2 critical and 2 high-severity interaction risks identified. See the full mechanism classification, interaction matrix, and deep-dive recommendations.

View Full Report →

Related Bridge Safety Analyses

Related Bridge Investment Analyses

Ratings use Hindenrank's eight-dimension risk rubric. Lower score = lower risk. Grades range from A (safest) to F (riskiest). This is not financial advice.