Is Stargate V1 a Good Investment?
| TVL | $11M |
| FDV | $33K |
| TVL/FDV | 333.99x |
| Risk Grade | B- |
| Value Grade | C |
Value Accrual: Does the Stargate V1 Token Capture Value?
Stargate V1 scores C on Hindenrank's value accrual framework (46/100), indicating average value capture — some strengths offset by weaknesses in fee distribution or sustainability. Fee capture scores 12/25 — moderate, with some fees reaching token holders but room for improvement. Token distribution is rated 12/25 (somewhat concentrated, raising concerns about governance capture), and emission sustainability sits at 10/25. The competitive moat dimension scores 12/25.
Protocol Health: Is Stargate V1 Still Growing?
Stargate V1's vitality risk score is 9/10 on Hindenrank's rubric (lower is healthier). This raises concerns about protocol vitality — Stargate V1 shows signs of declining activity, stagnant or falling TVL, or reduced developer engagement. Investors should monitor whether this trend reverses before increasing exposure.
Risk-Adjusted View: Is the Upside Worth the Risk?
Risk-Adjusted Position
Safe but StaleStargate V1 falls in the Safe but Stale zone — low risk (B-) but middling value capture (C). The protocol is well-built and battle-tested, but its token may not capture much upside from growth. This positioning can be appropriate for risk-averse allocators who prioritize capital preservation.
Risk Context
Stargate V1 carries a risk grade of B- (30/100), classified as moderate risk — some novel mechanisms, generally well-understood. While no critical-severity interactions were identified, 1 high-severity interaction warrant attention. The primary risk factor is: LayerZero messaging layer dependency — Stargate's cross-chain transfers rely on LayerZero's relayer and oracle network for message verification
Read our full safety analysis →Should you buy Stargate V1?
Stargate V1 scores C on Hindenrank's value accrual framework, placing it among the average Bridge protocols. Fee capture scores 12/25 — moderate, with some fees reaching token holders but room for improvement. Token distribution is somewhat concentrated, raising concerns about governance capture, and emission sustainability sits at 10/25. On the risk side, Stargate V1 carries a B- grade (30/100), which is moderate risk — some novel mechanisms, generally well-understood. The combined risk-value position places Stargate V1 in the Safe but Stale quadrant.
Stargate V1 investment outlook for 2026
With $11M in total value locked and FDV of $32,935, giving a TVL/FDV ratio of 333.99, Stargate V1's fundamentals do not strongly support the current valuation from a usage perspective. The competitive moat dimension scores 12/25, suggesting meaningful but not impregnable competitive advantages.Investors should weigh these fundamentals alongside market conditions and their own risk tolerance.
This analysis is based on cryptoeconomic fundamentals, not price prediction. It is not financial advice. Full methodology
Weekly Commentary
ProWeek of March 3, 2026
Stargate V1 lands a B- risk grade on solid LayerZero infrastructure, but the C value score tells the real story — with just $11M in TVL and V2 already live, fee capture and competitive relevance are eroding fast. This is a bridge running on fumes of its former position, safe enough to hold but offering little reason to enter fresh capital.
Exploring options?
Compare Bridge Alternatives →