Is Stargate V1 a Good Investment?
Deprecated V1 bridge with residual liquidity; STG token shared with V2 but V1 is no longer the actively developed product.
| TVL | $11M |
| FDV | $33K |
| TVL/FDV | 333.12x |
| Risk Grade | B- |
| Value Grade | C |
Value Accrual: Does the Stargate V1 Token Capture Value?
Stargate V1 scores C on Hindenrank's value accrual framework (46/100), indicating average value capture — some strengths offset by weaknesses in fee distribution or sustainability. Fee capture scores 12/25 — moderate, with some fees reaching token holders but room for improvement. Token distribution is rated 12/25 (somewhat concentrated, raising concerns about governance capture), and emission sustainability sits at 10/25. The competitive moat dimension scores 12/25.
Protocol Health: Is Stargate V1 Still Growing?
Stargate V1's vitality risk score is 9/10 on Hindenrank's rubric (lower is healthier). This raises concerns about protocol vitality — Stargate V1 shows signs of declining activity, stagnant or falling TVL, or reduced developer engagement. Investors should monitor whether this trend reverses before increasing exposure.
Risk-Adjusted View: Is the Upside Worth the Risk?
Risk-Adjusted Position
Safe but StaleStargate V1 falls in the Safe but Stale zone — low risk (B-) but middling value capture (C). The protocol is well-built and battle-tested, but its token may not capture much upside from growth. This positioning can be appropriate for risk-averse allocators who prioritize capital preservation.
Risk Context
Stargate V1 carries a risk grade of B- (30/100), classified as moderate risk — some novel mechanisms, generally well-understood. While no critical-severity interactions were identified, 1 high-severity interaction warrant attention. The primary risk factor is: LayerZero messaging layer dependency — Stargate's cross-chain transfers rely on LayerZero's relayer and oracle network for message verification
Read our full safety analysis →Where Stargate V1 Sits Among Bridge Peers
On risk, Stargate V1 ranks #3 of 24 Bridge protocols (top quartile — safer than most). That's 13 points safer than the sector average of 43/100.
The closest peer by risk profile is tBTC (grade B-, 30/100). See the side-by-side comparison to weigh their tradeoffs.
Should you buy Stargate V1?
Stargate V1 scores C on Hindenrank's value accrual framework, placing it among the average Bridge protocols. Fee capture scores 12/25 — moderate, with some fees reaching token holders but room for improvement. Token distribution is somewhat concentrated, raising concerns about governance capture, and emission sustainability sits at 10/25. On the risk side, Stargate V1 carries a B- grade (30/100), which is moderate risk — some novel mechanisms, generally well-understood. The combined risk-value position places Stargate V1 in the Safe but Stale quadrant.
Stargate V1 investment outlook for 2026
With $11M in total value locked and FDV of $32,654, giving a TVL/FDV ratio of 333.12, Stargate V1's fundamentals do not strongly support the current valuation from a usage perspective. The competitive moat dimension scores 12/25, suggesting meaningful but not impregnable competitive advantages.Investors should weigh these fundamentals alongside market conditions and their own risk tolerance.
This analysis is based on cryptoeconomic fundamentals, not price prediction. It is not financial advice. Full methodology
Weekly Commentary
ProWeek of April 19, 2026
Stargate V1 holds $10.9M TVL as liquidity continues migrating to V2. High protocolVitality risk score reflects the V1 deprecation trajectory. No new security incidents since last scan.
Exploring options?
Compare Bridge Alternatives →Related Bridge Investment Analyses
Related Bridge Safety Analyses
Get risk alerts before it's too late
Weekly grade changes, downgrade alerts, and new protocol risk findings. Free.