Aave V3 vs Maple Finance: Risk & Value Comparison
Aave V3
Maple Finance
Sector
Lending
Lending
Risk Score
51/100
52/100
Risk Grade
C-
C-
Value Score
79/100
47/100
Value Grade
B+
C
TVL
$13.4B
$2.0B
FDV
$1.3B
$204M
Mechanisms
10
7
Interactions
7
5
Quadrant
Promising
Neutral
Risk Dimension Comparison
Mechanism Novelty/ 15
Aave V3
0
Maple Finance
8
Interaction Severity/ 20
Aave V3
14
Maple Finance
10
Oracle Surface/ 10
Aave V3
5
Maple Finance
2
Documentation Quality/ 10
Aave V3
1
Maple Finance
3
Track Record/ 15
Aave V3
10
Maple Finance
12
Scale Exposure/ 10
Aave V3
9
Maple Finance
7
Regulatory Risk/ 10
Aave V3
5
Maple Finance
7
Protocol Vitality/ 10
Aave V3
7
Maple Finance
3
Value Dimension Comparison
Fee Capture/ 25
Aave V3
22
Maple Finance
11
Token Distribution/ 25
Aave V3
14
Maple Finance
9
Emission Sustainability/ 25
Aave V3
20
Maple Finance
14
Competitive Moat/ 25
Aave V3
23
Maple Finance
13
Verdict
Aave V3 is the safer protocol with a risk score of 51/100 (C-) compared to 52/100 (C-).
Aave V3 has stronger value accrual (B+, 79/100) compared to C (47/100).