Apollo Diversified Credit Securitize Fund vs Hastra: Risk & Value Comparison
Apollo Diversified Credit Securitize Fund
Hastra
Sector
RWA
RWA
Risk Score
33/100
33/100
Risk Grade
B-
B-
Value Score
18/100
60/100
Value Grade
D-
B-
TVL
$90M
$384M
FDV
$114M
—
Mechanisms
6
7
Interactions
4
6
Quadrant
Dead Money
Blue Chip
Risk Dimension Comparison
Mechanism Novelty/ 15
Apollo Diversified Credit Securitize Fund
3
Hastra
5
Interaction Severity/ 20
Apollo Diversified Credit Securitize Fund
5
Hastra
6
Oracle Surface/ 10
Apollo Diversified Credit Securitize Fund
2
Hastra
3
Documentation Quality/ 10
Apollo Diversified Credit Securitize Fund
2
Hastra
3
Track Record/ 15
Apollo Diversified Credit Securitize Fund
4
Hastra
2
Scale Exposure/ 10
Apollo Diversified Credit Securitize Fund
5
Hastra
5
Regulatory Risk/ 10
Apollo Diversified Credit Securitize Fund
8
Hastra
6
Protocol Vitality/ 10
Apollo Diversified Credit Securitize Fund
4
Hastra
3
Value Dimension Comparison
Fee Capture/ 25
Apollo Diversified Credit Securitize Fund
2
Hastra
15
Token Distribution/ 25
Apollo Diversified Credit Securitize Fund
4
Hastra
10
Emission Sustainability/ 25
Apollo Diversified Credit Securitize Fund
6
Hastra
20
Competitive Moat/ 25
Apollo Diversified Credit Securitize Fund
6
Hastra
15
Verdict
Both protocols have identical risk scores (33/100), making them equally risky.
Hastra has stronger value accrual (B-, 60/100) compared to D- (18/100).
Apollo Diversified Credit Securitize Fund