Apollo Diversified Credit Securitize Fund vs Lofty: Risk & Value Comparison
Apollo Diversified Credit Securitize Fund
Lofty
Sector
RWA
RWA
Risk Score
33/100
33/100
Risk Grade
B-
B-
Value Score
18/100
42/100
Value Grade
D-
C-
TVL
$90M
$99M
FDV
$114M
—
Mechanisms
6
5
Interactions
4
4
Quadrant
Dead Money
Safe but Stale
Risk Dimension Comparison
Mechanism Novelty/ 15
Apollo Diversified Credit Securitize Fund
3
Lofty
4
Interaction Severity/ 20
Apollo Diversified Credit Securitize Fund
5
Lofty
6
Oracle Surface/ 10
Apollo Diversified Credit Securitize Fund
2
Lofty
2
Documentation Quality/ 10
Apollo Diversified Credit Securitize Fund
2
Lofty
3
Track Record/ 15
Apollo Diversified Credit Securitize Fund
4
Lofty
4
Scale Exposure/ 10
Apollo Diversified Credit Securitize Fund
5
Lofty
3
Regulatory Risk/ 10
Apollo Diversified Credit Securitize Fund
8
Lofty
8
Protocol Vitality/ 10
Apollo Diversified Credit Securitize Fund
4
Lofty
3
Value Dimension Comparison
Fee Capture/ 25
Apollo Diversified Credit Securitize Fund
2
Lofty
12
Token Distribution/ 25
Apollo Diversified Credit Securitize Fund
4
Lofty
10
Emission Sustainability/ 25
Apollo Diversified Credit Securitize Fund
6
Lofty
10
Competitive Moat/ 25
Apollo Diversified Credit Securitize Fund
6
Lofty
10
Verdict
Both protocols have identical risk scores (33/100), making them equally risky.
Lofty has stronger value accrual (C-, 42/100) compared to D- (18/100).
Apollo Diversified Credit Securitize Fund