Aster asBNB vs Felix Vaults: Risk & Value Comparison
Aster asBNB
Felix Vaults
Sector
Yield
Yield
Risk Score
36/100
36/100
Risk Grade
C+
C+
Value Score
25/100
22/100
Value Grade
D
D
TVL
$157M
$87M
FDV
$5.3B
—
Mechanisms
5
6
Interactions
4
5
Quadrant
Weak
Weak
Risk Dimension Comparison
Mechanism Novelty/ 15
Aster asBNB
4
Felix Vaults
6
Interaction Severity/ 20
Aster asBNB
7
Felix Vaults
8
Oracle Surface/ 10
Aster asBNB
3
Felix Vaults
3
Documentation Quality/ 10
Aster asBNB
3
Felix Vaults
3
Track Record/ 15
Aster asBNB
3
Felix Vaults
5
Scale Exposure/ 10
Aster asBNB
6
Felix Vaults
3
Regulatory Risk/ 10
Aster asBNB
4
Felix Vaults
2
Protocol Vitality/ 10
Aster asBNB
6
Felix Vaults
6
Value Dimension Comparison
Fee Capture/ 25
Aster asBNB
5
Felix Vaults
5
Token Distribution/ 25
Aster asBNB
8
Felix Vaults
4
Emission Sustainability/ 25
Aster asBNB
5
Felix Vaults
6
Competitive Moat/ 25
Aster asBNB
7
Felix Vaults
7
Verdict
Both protocols have identical risk scores (36/100), making them equally risky.
Aster asBNB has stronger value accrual (D, 25/100) compared to D (22/100).