AUTOfinance vs CIAN Yield Layer: Risk & Value Comparison
AUTOfinance
CIAN Yield Layer
Sector
Yield
Yield
Risk Score
32/100
32/100
Risk Grade
B-
B-
Value Score
30/100
22/100
Value Grade
D+
D
TVL
$49M
$358M
FDV
$6M
—
Mechanisms
5
5
Interactions
4
4
Quadrant
Dead Money
Dead Money
Risk Dimension Comparison
Mechanism Novelty/ 15
AUTOfinance
3
CIAN Yield Layer
3
Interaction Severity/ 20
AUTOfinance
5
CIAN Yield Layer
5
Oracle Surface/ 10
AUTOfinance
2
CIAN Yield Layer
2
Documentation Quality/ 10
AUTOfinance
2
CIAN Yield Layer
4
Track Record/ 15
AUTOfinance
6
CIAN Yield Layer
3
Scale Exposure/ 10
AUTOfinance
3
CIAN Yield Layer
5
Regulatory Risk/ 10
AUTOfinance
4
CIAN Yield Layer
4
Protocol Vitality/ 10
AUTOfinance
7
CIAN Yield Layer
6
Value Dimension Comparison
Fee Capture/ 25
AUTOfinance
9
CIAN Yield Layer
8
Token Distribution/ 25
AUTOfinance
7
CIAN Yield Layer
5
Emission Sustainability/ 25
AUTOfinance
6
CIAN Yield Layer
5
Competitive Moat/ 25
AUTOfinance
8
CIAN Yield Layer
4
Verdict
Both protocols have identical risk scores (32/100), making them equally risky.
AUTOfinance has stronger value accrual (D+, 30/100) compared to D (22/100).