Avalon CeDeFi vs Mainstreet: Risk & Value Comparison
Avalon CeDeFi
Mainstreet
Sector
Yield
Yield
Risk Score
43/100
43/100
Risk Grade
C
C
Value Score
28/100
38/100
Value Grade
D+
C-
TVL
$107M
$55M
FDV
—
—
Mechanisms
6
6
Interactions
5
4
Quadrant
Weak
Neutral
Risk Dimension Comparison
Mechanism Novelty/ 15
Avalon CeDeFi
5
Mainstreet
9
Interaction Severity/ 20
Avalon CeDeFi
10
Mainstreet
8
Oracle Surface/ 10
Avalon CeDeFi
3
Mainstreet
4
Documentation Quality/ 10
Avalon CeDeFi
3
Mainstreet
5
Track Record/ 15
Avalon CeDeFi
6
Mainstreet
7
Scale Exposure/ 10
Avalon CeDeFi
5
Mainstreet
3
Regulatory Risk/ 10
Avalon CeDeFi
6
Mainstreet
4
Protocol Vitality/ 10
Avalon CeDeFi
5
Mainstreet
3
Value Dimension Comparison
Fee Capture/ 25
Avalon CeDeFi
8
Mainstreet
10
Token Distribution/ 25
Avalon CeDeFi
5
Mainstreet
7
Emission Sustainability/ 25
Avalon CeDeFi
7
Mainstreet
12
Competitive Moat/ 25
Avalon CeDeFi
8
Mainstreet
9
Verdict
Both protocols have identical risk scores (43/100), making them equally risky.
Mainstreet has stronger value accrual (C-, 38/100) compared to D+ (28/100).