Blast vs Stacks: Risk & Value Comparison

Blast logoBlast

L2

Risk

C

Value

C-

Neutral

Stacks logoStacks

L2

Risk

B

Value

C+

Safe but Stale

Blast
Stacks
Sector
L2
L2
Risk Score
43/100
21/100
Risk Grade
C
B
Value Score
37/100
50/100
Value Grade
C-
C+
TVL
$51M
$86M
FDV
$26M
$256M
Mechanisms
7
6
Interactions
6
5
Quadrant
Neutral
Safe but Stale

Risk Dimension Comparison

Mechanism Novelty/ 15
Blast
3
Stacks
3
Interaction Severity/ 20
Blast
10
Stacks
6
Oracle Surface/ 10
Blast
0
Stacks
0
Documentation Quality/ 10
Blast
7
Stacks
2
Track Record/ 15
Blast
10
Stacks
3
Scale Exposure/ 10
Blast
3
Stacks
5
Regulatory Risk/ 10
Blast
2
Stacks
2
Protocol Vitality/ 10
Blast
8
Stacks
0

Value Dimension Comparison

Fee Capture/ 25
Blast
8
Stacks
14
Token Distribution/ 25
Blast
10
Stacks
10
Emission Sustainability/ 25
Blast
8
Stacks
14
Competitive Moat/ 25
Blast
11
Stacks
12

Verdict

Stacks is the safer protocol with a risk score of 21/100 (B) compared to 43/100 (C).

Stacks has stronger value accrual (C+, 50/100) compared to C- (37/100).