Blur vs ICHI: Risk & Value Comparison

Blur logoBlur

DeFi

Risk

B-

Value

C-

Safe but Stale

ICHI logoICHI

DeFi

Risk

B-

Value

C-

Safe but Stale

Blur
ICHI
Sector
DeFi
DeFi
Risk Score
32/100
32/100
Risk Grade
B-
B-
Value Score
42/100
38/100
Value Grade
C-
C-
TVL
$20M
$13M
FDV
$63M
$1M
Mechanisms
6
5
Interactions
5
4
Quadrant
Safe but Stale
Safe but Stale

Risk Dimension Comparison

Mechanism Novelty/ 15
Blur
6
ICHI
3
Interaction Severity/ 20
Blur
7
ICHI
5
Oracle Surface/ 10
Blur
0
ICHI
2
Documentation Quality/ 10
Blur
4
ICHI
2
Track Record/ 15
Blur
0
ICHI
6
Scale Exposure/ 10
Blur
3
ICHI
3
Regulatory Risk/ 10
Blur
4
ICHI
2
Protocol Vitality/ 10
Blur
8
ICHI
9

Value Dimension Comparison

Fee Capture/ 25
Blur
2
ICHI
10
Token Distribution/ 25
Blur
16
ICHI
10
Emission Sustainability/ 25
Blur
14
ICHI
8
Competitive Moat/ 25
Blur
10
ICHI
10

Verdict

Both protocols have identical risk scores (32/100), making them equally risky.

Blur has stronger value accrual (C-, 42/100) compared to C- (38/100).