CIAN Yield Layer vs Seamless Vaults: Risk & Value Comparison
CIAN Yield Layer
Seamless Vaults
Sector
Yield
Yield
Risk Score
30/100
30/100
Risk Grade
B-
B-
Value Score
22/100
26/100
Value Grade
D
D
TVL
$340M
$2M
FDV
—
$1M
Mechanisms
5
6
Interactions
4
5
Quadrant
Dead Money
Dead Money
Risk Dimension Comparison
Mechanism Novelty/ 15
CIAN Yield Layer
3
Seamless Vaults
6
Interaction Severity/ 20
CIAN Yield Layer
5
Seamless Vaults
5
Oracle Surface/ 10
CIAN Yield Layer
2
Seamless Vaults
2
Documentation Quality/ 10
CIAN Yield Layer
4
Seamless Vaults
2
Track Record/ 15
CIAN Yield Layer
3
Seamless Vaults
3
Scale Exposure/ 10
CIAN Yield Layer
5
Seamless Vaults
0
Regulatory Risk/ 10
CIAN Yield Layer
4
Seamless Vaults
4
Protocol Vitality/ 10
CIAN Yield Layer
4
Seamless Vaults
8
Value Dimension Comparison
Fee Capture/ 25
CIAN Yield Layer
8
Seamless Vaults
5
Token Distribution/ 25
CIAN Yield Layer
5
Seamless Vaults
10
Emission Sustainability/ 25
CIAN Yield Layer
5
Seamless Vaults
5
Competitive Moat/ 25
CIAN Yield Layer
4
Seamless Vaults
6
Verdict
Both protocols have identical risk scores (30/100), making them equally risky.
Seamless Vaults has stronger value accrual (D, 26/100) compared to D (22/100).