CIAN Yield Layer vs Yield Yak Aggregator: Risk & Value Comparison
CIAN Yield Layer
Yield Yak Aggregator
Sector
Yield
Yield
Risk Score
29/100
29/100
Risk Grade
B-
B-
Value Score
22/100
24/100
Value Grade
D
D
TVL
$252M
$13M
FDV
—
$2M
Mechanisms
5
5
Interactions
4
4
Quadrant
Dead Money
Dead Money
Risk Dimension Comparison
Mechanism Novelty/ 15
CIAN Yield Layer
3
Yield Yak Aggregator
0
Interaction Severity/ 20
CIAN Yield Layer
5
Yield Yak Aggregator
4
Oracle Surface/ 10
CIAN Yield Layer
2
Yield Yak Aggregator
0
Documentation Quality/ 10
CIAN Yield Layer
4
Yield Yak Aggregator
4
Track Record/ 15
CIAN Yield Layer
3
Yield Yak Aggregator
9
Scale Exposure/ 10
CIAN Yield Layer
5
Yield Yak Aggregator
3
Regulatory Risk/ 10
CIAN Yield Layer
4
Yield Yak Aggregator
4
Protocol Vitality/ 10
CIAN Yield Layer
3
Yield Yak Aggregator
5
Value Dimension Comparison
Fee Capture/ 25
CIAN Yield Layer
8
Yield Yak Aggregator
8
Token Distribution/ 25
CIAN Yield Layer
5
Yield Yak Aggregator
8
Emission Sustainability/ 25
CIAN Yield Layer
5
Yield Yak Aggregator
4
Competitive Moat/ 25
CIAN Yield Layer
4
Yield Yak Aggregator
4
Verdict
Both protocols have identical risk scores (29/100), making them equally risky.
Yield Yak Aggregator has stronger value accrual (D, 24/100) compared to D (22/100).
Yield Yak Aggregator