cSigma Finance vs RAAC: Risk & Value Comparison
cSigma Finance
RAAC
Sector
RWA
RWA
Risk Score
49/100
49/100
Risk Grade
C
C
Value Score
32/100
22/100
Value Grade
D+
D
TVL
$13M
$124M
FDV
$10M
—
Mechanisms
7
7
Interactions
4
5
Quadrant
Weak
Weak
Risk Dimension Comparison
Mechanism Novelty/ 15
cSigma Finance
8
RAAC
8
Interaction Severity/ 20
cSigma Finance
10
RAAC
10
Oracle Surface/ 10
cSigma Finance
4
RAAC
5
Documentation Quality/ 10
cSigma Finance
5
RAAC
3
Track Record/ 15
cSigma Finance
9
RAAC
4
Scale Exposure/ 10
cSigma Finance
3
RAAC
5
Regulatory Risk/ 10
cSigma Finance
6
RAAC
8
Protocol Vitality/ 10
cSigma Finance
4
RAAC
6
Value Dimension Comparison
Fee Capture/ 25
cSigma Finance
8
RAAC
5
Token Distribution/ 25
cSigma Finance
7
RAAC
4
Emission Sustainability/ 25
cSigma Finance
9
RAAC
6
Competitive Moat/ 25
cSigma Finance
8
RAAC
7
Verdict
Both protocols have identical risk scores (49/100), making them equally risky.
cSigma Finance has stronger value accrual (D+, 32/100) compared to D (22/100).