Extra Finance vs Jones DAO: Risk & Value Comparison
Extra Finance
Jones DAO
Sector
Yield
Yield
Risk Score
39/100
39/100
Risk Grade
C+
C+
Value Score
44/100
22/100
Value Grade
C
D
TVL
$28M
$1M
FDV
$5M
$1M
Mechanisms
7
7
Interactions
6
5
Quadrant
Neutral
Weak
Risk Dimension Comparison
Mechanism Novelty/ 15
Extra Finance
3
Jones DAO
6
Interaction Severity/ 20
Extra Finance
10
Jones DAO
11
Oracle Surface/ 10
Extra Finance
5
Jones DAO
5
Documentation Quality/ 10
Extra Finance
3
Jones DAO
3
Track Record/ 15
Extra Finance
4
Jones DAO
5
Scale Exposure/ 10
Extra Finance
3
Jones DAO
0
Regulatory Risk/ 10
Extra Finance
2
Jones DAO
2
Protocol Vitality/ 10
Extra Finance
9
Jones DAO
7
Value Dimension Comparison
Fee Capture/ 25
Extra Finance
12
Jones DAO
6
Token Distribution/ 25
Extra Finance
8
Jones DAO
4
Emission Sustainability/ 25
Extra Finance
13
Jones DAO
6
Competitive Moat/ 25
Extra Finance
11
Jones DAO
6
Verdict
Both protocols have identical risk scores (39/100), making them equally risky.
Extra Finance has stronger value accrual (C, 44/100) compared to D (22/100).