Extra Finance vs YO (yield.fi): Risk & Value Comparison

Extra Finance logoExtra Finance

Yield

Risk

C+

Value

C

Neutral

YO (yield.fi) logoYO (yield.fi)

Yield

Risk

C+

Value

B-

Promising

Extra Finance
YO (yield.fi)
Sector
Yield
Yield
Risk Score
39/100
39/100
Risk Grade
C+
C+
Value Score
44/100
58/100
Value Grade
C
B-
TVL
$28M
$80M
FDV
$5M
Mechanisms
7
5
Interactions
6
4
Quadrant
Neutral
Promising

Risk Dimension Comparison

Mechanism Novelty/ 15
Extra Finance
3
YO (yield.fi)
7
Interaction Severity/ 20
Extra Finance
10
YO (yield.fi)
8
Oracle Surface/ 10
Extra Finance
5
YO (yield.fi)
4
Documentation Quality/ 10
Extra Finance
3
YO (yield.fi)
4
Track Record/ 15
Extra Finance
4
YO (yield.fi)
5
Scale Exposure/ 10
Extra Finance
3
YO (yield.fi)
3
Regulatory Risk/ 10
Extra Finance
2
YO (yield.fi)
2
Protocol Vitality/ 10
Extra Finance
9
YO (yield.fi)
6

Value Dimension Comparison

These protocols use different value scoring frameworks (YO (yield.fi): Stablecoin), so individual dimension comparison is not applicable.

Extra Finance

C

44/100

YO (yield.fi)

B-

58/100

Verdict

Both protocols have identical risk scores (39/100), making them equally risky.

YO (yield.fi) has stronger value accrual (B-, 58/100) compared to C (44/100).