Aevo
Elevated risk — recent oracle exploit plus centralized order matching and sequencer create serious trust concerns for a derivatives platform
Top Risks
1
December 2025 oracle exploit drained $2.7M from legacy Ribbon DOV vaults via precision mismatch and access control flaw in the proxy-upgradeable oracle stack.
2
Custom proxy-upgradeable oracle infrastructure creates ongoing precision and access control attack vectors when new assets are added or decimal configurations change.
3
Centralized matching engine on custom L2 rollup creates information asymmetry where the operator can observe orders before on-chain settlement.
Risk Breakdown
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Aevo safe to use?
Aevo receives a C risk grade (50/100) from Hindenrank, where lower scores indicate lower risk. Elevated risk — recent oracle exploit plus centralized order matching and sequencer create serious trust concerns for a derivatives platform An options and perpetual futures trading platform that runs on its own custom blockchain. It holds $22M in deposits and raised $17M in funding. Its C- grade reflects a $2.7M exploit in December 2025 caused by a price feed precision error, plus centralization risks from its privately run blockchain and matching engine.
What are the main risks of using Aevo?
The key risks identified for Aevo are: (1) A $2.7M hack in December 2025 happened because a price feed upgrade mixed up decimal places, letting an attacker set fake prices and drain money from options vaults. (2) The trading engine matches orders on a private server before settling on-chain. The operator can see your orders before everyone else, creating potential for front-running. (3) If the custom blockchain goes down during a big options expiry, you cannot close your positions and your options could expire at the wrong price.
What is Aevo's risk score breakdown?
Aevo scores 50/100 across eight risk dimensions: Mechanism Novelty: 3/15, Interaction Severity: 14/20, Oracle Surface: 7/10, Documentation Gaps: 3/10, Track Record: 10/15, Scale Exposure: 3/10, Regulatory Risk: 5/10, Vitality Risk: 5/10. The highest risk area is Interaction Severity at 14/20.
How does Aevo compare to other Derivatives protocols?
Among 53 rated Derivatives protocols on Hindenrank, Aevo ranks #49 by safety (lowest risk score = safest). Its 50/100 risk score and C grade place it among the riskier Derivatives protocols.
Has Aevo ever been hacked or exploited?
Aevo scores 10/15 on the Track Record risk dimension, indicating some history of security incidents or exploits. Higher scores reflect more severe or frequent incidents. Review the full risk report for details.
Last scanned 2026-02-12