//Aftermath Finance
B-

Aftermath Finance

Risk Score 35/100·C-Value
Compare
$3MTVL·DEXWebsite →

Elevated risk — first exploit on record (April 2026 perpetuals integer overflow) degrades an otherwise clean track record; afSUI systemic risk and full team control remain material concerns

Risk Breakdown

Top Risks

1

April 2026 perpetuals exploit: $1.14M USDC drained via integer overflow in fee accounting (u256/signed cast mismatch, no input validation). Trading paused; losses covered by Mysten Labs and Sui Foundation. Perpetuals product under security review.

2

afSUI liquid staking token is used as collateral across Sui DeFi (Suilend, NAVI). A depeg event would trigger cascading liquidations across the Sui ecosystem.

3

No governance token means the team controls all protocol parameters unilaterally, with no community oversight or decentralized safety mechanisms.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Aftermath Finance safe to use?
Aftermath Finance receives a B- risk grade (35/100) from Hindenrank, where lower scores indicate lower risk. Elevated risk — first exploit on record (April 2026 perpetuals integer overflow) degrades an otherwise clean track record; afSUI systemic risk and full team control remain material concerns A DEX and liquid staking platform on the Sui blockchain managing $4.4M in deposits. In April 2026 the perpetuals product suffered a $1.14M exploit via integer overflow in fee accounting; losses were covered by Mysten Labs and Sui Foundation. The B- grade reflects a clean 2.7-year AMM/LST track record offset by the first confirmed exploit and full team control with no governance token.
What are the main risks of using Aftermath Finance?
The key risks identified for Aftermath Finance are: (1) The perpetuals product was exploited in April 2026 for $1.14M via a basic integer overflow bug. Losses were reimbursed externally, but the incident reveals insufficient input validation in the fee accounting system. (2) The afSUI staking token is used as collateral across Sui's DeFi ecosystem. If it drops in value, liquidations cascade across multiple lending platforms. (3) The team controls the entire protocol with no governance token. They can change any parameter or upgrade any contract without community approval.
What is Aftermath Finance's risk score breakdown?
Aftermath Finance scores 35/100 across eight risk dimensions: Mechanism Novelty: 0/15, Interaction Severity: 8/20, Oracle Surface: 2/10, Documentation Gaps: 3/10, Track Record: 11/15, Scale Exposure: 0/10, Regulatory Risk: 4/10, Vitality Risk: 7/10. The highest risk area is Track Record at 11/15.
How does Aftermath Finance compare to other DEX protocols?
Among 112 rated DEX protocols on Hindenrank, Aftermath Finance ranks #59 by safety (lowest risk score = safest). Its 35/100 risk score and B- grade place it in the middle tier of DEX protocols.
Has Aftermath Finance ever been hacked or exploited?
Aftermath Finance scores 11/15 on the Track Record risk dimension, indicating some history of security incidents or exploits. Higher scores reflect more severe or frequent incidents. Review the full risk report for details.

Incident History

1incident|$1Mtotal losses
Last scanned 2026-04-30

Get risk alerts before it's too late

Weekly grade changes, downgrade alerts, and new protocol risk findings. Free.