Aftermath Finance
Moderate risk — clean security record and well-tested mechanisms, but full team control and afSUI systemic risk warrant caution
Top Risks
1
afSUI liquid staking token is used as collateral across Sui DeFi (Suilend, NAVI). A depeg event would trigger cascading liquidations across the Sui ecosystem.
2
No governance token means the team controls all protocol parameters unilaterally, with no community oversight or decentralized safety mechanisms.
3
Multi-asset weighted pools with up to 8 assets create complex impermanent loss dynamics that are harder for LPs to model and hedge than standard 2-asset pools.
Risk Breakdown
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Aftermath Finance safe to use?
Aftermath Finance receives a B risk grade (27/100) from Hindenrank, where lower scores indicate lower risk. Moderate risk — clean security record and well-tested mechanisms, but full team control and afSUI systemic risk warrant caution A decentralized exchange and liquid staking platform on the Sui blockchain. It manages $5M in deposits with a clean security track record and no exploits since launch. Its B grade reflects standard, well-tested mechanisms and small scale, offset by team centralization and the systemic risk that afSUI poses to the broader Sui DeFi ecosystem.
What are the main risks of using Aftermath Finance?
The key risks identified for Aftermath Finance are: (1) The afSUI staking token is used as collateral across Sui's DeFi ecosystem. If it drops in value, liquidations cascade across multiple lending platforms. (2) The team controls the entire protocol with no governance token. They can change any parameter or upgrade any contract without community approval. (3) Pools with up to 8 different tokens create complex loss dynamics. Your share of the pool gets concentrated in the falling token while the winners get drained by traders.
What is Aftermath Finance's risk score breakdown?
Aftermath Finance scores 27/100 across eight risk dimensions: Mechanism Novelty: 0/15, Interaction Severity: 8/20, Oracle Surface: 2/10, Documentation Gaps: 3/10, Track Record: 3/15, Scale Exposure: 0/10, Regulatory Risk: 4/10, Vitality Risk: 7/10. The highest risk area is Vitality Risk at 7/10.
How does Aftermath Finance compare to other DEX protocols?
Among 111 rated DEX protocols on Hindenrank, Aftermath Finance ranks #27 by safety (lowest risk score = safest). Its 27/100 risk score and B grade place it among the safer DEX protocols.
Has Aftermath Finance ever been hacked or exploited?
Aftermath Finance scores 3/15 on the Track Record risk dimension, indicating some history of security incidents or exploits. Higher scores reflect more severe or frequent incidents. Review the full risk report for details.
Last scanned 2026-02-27