Moderate risk — Alchemix V3's self-repaying loan design is genuinely novel and the diversified MYT basket improves on V2's single-strategy isolation risk. However, routing all yield through Morpho V2 introduces a new critical systemic dependency, the 90% LTV raises peg-stability requirements for alETH (historically 2-5% depegged), and ALCX's perpetual emission schedule with no direct fee sharing limits token value accrual. Grade C reflects innovative product design offset by concrete collateral dependency risk.
Risk Breakdown
Top Risks
Alchemix V3's MYT (Mix-Yield Token) routes all collateral yield through Morpho V2 as a base layer. A critical Morpho V2 exploit or systemic failure would drain the yield-generating collateral backing all V3 positions simultaneously — a single systemic dependency that V2's isolated vaults avoided. This is the protocol's highest-severity risk.
alETH has persistently traded at a 2-5% structural discount to ETH (Q1 2026: ~4.3% discount) and alUSD at ~2% below par. At V3's 90% LTV, even a modest alAsset peg weakening combined with yield compression could leave positions where debt exceeds practical collateral value — with no liquidation mechanism to force resolution. The protocol relies entirely on transmuter and AMO operations to restore peg, and both are rate-limited.
Self-repaying loans require sustained underlying yield. At current compressed DeFi yields (Aave USDC at 2-4%), a 90% LTV alUSD loan has an implied repayment horizon of 50+ years. Users who borrowed expecting multi-year repayment face permanent capital lock-up if yields remain suppressed or compress further — creating a fragile trapped-capital dynamic at scale.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Alchemix V3 safe to use?
What are the main risks of using Alchemix V3?
What is Alchemix V3's risk score breakdown?
How does Alchemix V3 compare to other Yield protocols?
Has Alchemix V3 ever been hacked or exploited?
Get risk alerts before it's too late
Weekly grade changes, downgrade alerts, and new protocol risk findings. Free.