Elevated risk — small Data Availability Committee, permissioned relayer with no fallback, and multi-chain fragmentation create material concerns, partially offset by the Sony partnership and clean security track record.
Risk Breakdown
Top Risks
Astar zkEVM uses a Data Availability Committee (DAC) with fewer than 5 external members (5/3 threshold), meaning a small group of entities can collude with the proposer to finalize state based on unavailable data, potentially causing loss of funds.
The relayer role in the DA bridge is permissioned with no Security Council or governance mechanism to replace it. If the relayer fails, the DA bridge halts and cannot recover without centralized intervention, creating a single point of failure.
Astar operates across multiple execution environments (Polkadot parachain, zkEVM via Polygon CDK, Soneium via Sony partnership) which fragments developer attention and TVL. The zkEVM has very low TVL relative to its ambitions, suggesting limited organic adoption.
The ASTR token has been inflationary (~665M/year) with a market cap that has declined significantly. Tokenomics 3.0 (fixed 10.5B supply cap) is planned for early 2026 but requires a governance vote, creating uncertainty about the inflation trajectory.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Astar Network safe to use?
What are the main risks of using Astar Network?
What is Astar Network's risk score breakdown?
How does Astar Network compare to other L2 protocols?
Has Astar Network ever been hacked or exploited?
Get risk alerts before it's too late
Weekly grade changes, downgrade alerts, and new protocol risk findings. Free.