Leaderboard/Babylon Protocol

Babylon Protocol

CRiskB-Value|$1.8BTVL$139MFDV|RestakingWebsite →

Elevated risk — groundbreaking BTC staking technology at $3.9B scale, but discovered consensus vulnerability and whale concentration create serious concerns

Top Risks

1

BLS vote extension vulnerability allows validators to bypass consensus by omitting block hash fields, undermining the security model at its core.

2

Native BTC staking without bridging is an untested paradigm at $3.9B scale with no historical precedent for this mechanism design.

3

32% TVL drop in a single unstaking event ($1.26B) reveals extreme whale concentration and capital flight risk.

Risk Breakdown

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Babylon Protocol safe to use?
Babylon Protocol receives a C risk grade (49/100) from Hindenrank, where lower scores indicate lower risk. Elevated risk — groundbreaking BTC staking technology at $3.9B scale, but discovered consensus vulnerability and whale concentration create serious concerns A protocol that lets you earn yield by staking Bitcoin without moving it off the Bitcoin blockchain. It holds $3.9B in staked BTC and raised $96M in funding. Its C- grade reflects genuinely novel but untested technology at massive scale, a discovered consensus vulnerability, and extreme whale concentration.
What are the main risks of using Babylon Protocol?
The key risks identified for Babylon Protocol are: (1) A vulnerability was found in the consensus mechanism that could let attackers bypass security checks. While being patched, this undermines trust in the core technology. (2) A single unstaking event drained 32% of all deposits ($1.26B), showing that a few large stakers control the protocol's stability. (3) Native BTC staking without bridges is brand new technology. At $3.9B, any undiscovered bug in the Bitcoin Script timelocks or cryptographic slashing could be catastrophic.
What is Babylon Protocol's risk score breakdown?
Babylon Protocol scores 49/100 across eight risk dimensions: Mechanism Novelty: 9/15, Interaction Severity: 14/20, Oracle Surface: 2/10, Documentation Gaps: 3/10, Track Record: 6/15, Scale Exposure: 7/10, Regulatory Risk: 3/10, Vitality Risk: 5/10. The highest risk area is Interaction Severity at 14/20.
How does Babylon Protocol compare to other Restaking protocols?
Among 23 rated Restaking protocols on Hindenrank, Babylon Protocol ranks #22 by safety (lowest risk score = safest). Its 49/100 risk score and C grade place it among the riskier Restaking protocols.
Has Babylon Protocol ever been hacked or exploited?
Babylon Protocol scores 6/15 on the Track Record risk dimension, indicating some history of security incidents or exploits. Higher scores reflect more severe or frequent incidents. Review the full risk report for details.
Last scanned 2026-03-12