Leaderboard/Belt Finance

Belt FinanceMicro-cap

C+RiskD-Value|$12MTVL$2MFDV|YieldWebsite →

Elevated risk — functional yield optimizer with institutional backing but major past exploit, multi-protocol dependency, and declining token value.

Top Risks

1

Suffered $50M flash loan exploit in May 2021 — major security failure history

2

Multi-strategy yield vaults create complex dependency chains across protocols

3

Cross-chain deployment (BSC, Klaytn, Heco) multiplies attack surface

4

StableSwap pools concentrate risk in stablecoin depeg scenarios

Risk Breakdown

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Belt Finance safe to use?
Belt Finance receives a C+ risk grade (42/100) from Hindenrank, where lower scores indicate lower risk. Elevated risk — functional yield optimizer with institutional backing but major past exploit, multi-protocol dependency, and declining token value. Belt Finance is a multi-strategy yield optimizer and stableswap AMM on BSC, Klaytn, and Heco that auto-compounds deposits across DeFi protocols. With $12M TVL, it suffered a major $50M exploit in 2021 but has since undergone V3 audit by DeDaub. Created by Ozys, a Klaytn Governance Council member.
What are the main risks of using Belt Finance?
The key risks identified for Belt Finance are: (1) Exploited for $50M in 2021 via flash loan attack — past security failures indicate elevated risk (2) Deposits are spread across multiple protocols — hack of any one causes partial loss (3) BELT token value has declined significantly, reducing farming reward value
What is Belt Finance's risk score breakdown?
Belt Finance scores 42/100 across eight risk dimensions: Mechanism Novelty: 3/15, Interaction Severity: 6/20, Oracle Surface: 2/10, Documentation Gaps: 4/10, Track Record: 15/15, Scale Exposure: 3/10, Regulatory Risk: 3/10, Vitality Risk: 6/10. The highest risk area is Track Record at 15/15.
How does Belt Finance compare to other Yield protocols?
Among 112 rated Yield protocols on Hindenrank, Belt Finance ranks #83 by safety (lowest risk score = safest). Its 42/100 risk score and C+ grade place it among the riskier Yield protocols.
Has Belt Finance ever been hacked or exploited?
Belt Finance scores 15/15 on the Track Record risk dimension, indicating some history of security incidents or exploits. Higher scores reflect more severe or frequent incidents. Review the full risk report for details.

Incident History

1incident|$6Mtotal losses
Last scanned 2026-02-25