//Beraborrow
B-

BeraborrowMicro-cap

Risk Score 35/100·D-Value
Compare
$364,000TVL·$246,591FDV·CDPWebsite →

Elevated risk — near-complete TVL collapse, minimal development activity, and underfunded stability pool make this protocol effectively abandoned with active exit liquidity risk for remaining depositors.

Risk Breakdown

Top Risks

1

Near-zero protocol vitality: TVL collapsed from $423M at peak (February 14, 2025) to approximately $384K by May 2026 — a 99.9% decline. The GitHub presence is minimal with only one public repository last updated in April 2024. Remaining deposits face severe exit liquidity risk and protocol abandonment risk.

2

Berachain ecosystem dependency: Beraborrow's PoL integration is wholly contingent on Berachain validator behavior directing BGT emissions to NECT liquidity gauges. As Berachain's total ecosystem TVL collapsed 97%+ from its March 2025 peak, BGT emission incentives for NECT pools dried up, collapsing the PoL flywheel that had driven Beraborrow's initial growth.

3

Multi-collateral complexity with Berachain-native assets: Beraborrow accepts iBGT (liquid-staked BGT), LP positions from BEX and Berps, and BTC/ETH derivatives (UNIBTC, SOLVBTC, STONE) as collateral. These Berachain-specific assets have thin liquidity and high correlation — a broad Berachain sell-off can impair multiple collateral types simultaneously.

4

NECT stability at near-zero TVL: the Liquid Stability Pool that absorbs liquidations requires depositors. With the protocol near-abandoned, the stability pool is likely underfunded, meaning NECT depeg events could go unchecked and hard-peg redemptions targeting undercollateralized dens could liquidate remaining users.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Beraborrow safe to use?
Beraborrow receives a B- risk grade (35/100) from Hindenrank, where lower scores indicate lower risk. Elevated risk — near-complete TVL collapse, minimal development activity, and underfunded stability pool make this protocol effectively abandoned with active exit liquidity risk for remaining depositors. Beraborrow is a Liquity v1 fork on Berachain that launched on February 6, 2025 (Berachain mainnet day one) and reached $423M TVL within 8 days via its novel PoL auto-compounding mechanism. As Berachain's ecosystem TVL collapsed 97%+ from its March 2025 peak, Beraborrow's TVL fell to approximately $384K by May 2026 — a 99.9% decline. The protocol has no confirmed exploits, but the near-complete TVL collapse and minimal development activity represent severe exit liquidity risk for remaining depositors. The POLLEN governance token has a $135K market cap.
What are the main risks of using Beraborrow?
The key risks identified for Beraborrow are: (1) Exit liquidity is critically low: with $384K TVL, the protocol is near-abandoned. If you deposit into Beraborrow, you may struggle to exit at fair value as NECT redemption mechanics can force-liquidate your den even if you are solvent. The stability pool required to absorb liquidations is likely underfunded. (2) The PoL flywheel that drove Beraborrow's growth has collapsed: Beraborrow's original value proposition was auto-compounding Berachain BGT emissions into CDP positions. As Berachain validator emission incentives for NECT liquidity pools dried up, this mechanism stopped generating yield, and TVL evaporated. (3) POLLEN governance can be controlled for almost nothing: the governance token has a $135K market cap. Acquiring enough vePOLLEN to influence protocol parameters requires minimal capital, creating governance attack risk. (4) Berachain-specific collateral is illiquid: iBGT, BEX LP positions, and Berps positions used as collateral have very thin secondary markets. In a forced liquidation scenario, the protocol may not be able to liquidate collateral at quoted oracle prices.
What is Beraborrow's risk score breakdown?
Beraborrow scores 35/100 across eight risk dimensions: Mechanism Novelty: 3/15, Interaction Severity: 11/20, Oracle Surface: 5/10, Documentation Gaps: 4/10, Track Record: 3/15, Scale Exposure: 0/10, Regulatory Risk: 2/10, Vitality Risk: 7/10. The highest risk area is Vitality Risk at 7/10.
How does Beraborrow compare to other CDP protocols?
Among 27 rated CDP protocols on Hindenrank, Beraborrow ranks #12 by safety (lowest risk score = safest). Its 35/100 risk score and B- grade place it in the middle tier of CDP protocols.
Has Beraborrow ever been hacked or exploited?
Beraborrow scores 3/15 on the Track Record risk dimension, indicating some history of security incidents or exploits. Higher scores reflect more severe or frequent incidents. Review the full risk report for details.
Last scanned 2026-05-07

Get risk alerts before it's too late

Weekly grade changes, downgrade alerts, and new protocol risk findings. Free.