Elevated risk — near-complete TVL collapse, minimal development activity, and underfunded stability pool make this protocol effectively abandoned with active exit liquidity risk for remaining depositors.
Risk Breakdown
Top Risks
Near-zero protocol vitality: TVL collapsed from $423M at peak (February 14, 2025) to approximately $384K by May 2026 — a 99.9% decline. The GitHub presence is minimal with only one public repository last updated in April 2024. Remaining deposits face severe exit liquidity risk and protocol abandonment risk.
Berachain ecosystem dependency: Beraborrow's PoL integration is wholly contingent on Berachain validator behavior directing BGT emissions to NECT liquidity gauges. As Berachain's total ecosystem TVL collapsed 97%+ from its March 2025 peak, BGT emission incentives for NECT pools dried up, collapsing the PoL flywheel that had driven Beraborrow's initial growth.
Multi-collateral complexity with Berachain-native assets: Beraborrow accepts iBGT (liquid-staked BGT), LP positions from BEX and Berps, and BTC/ETH derivatives (UNIBTC, SOLVBTC, STONE) as collateral. These Berachain-specific assets have thin liquidity and high correlation — a broad Berachain sell-off can impair multiple collateral types simultaneously.
NECT stability at near-zero TVL: the Liquid Stability Pool that absorbs liquidations requires depositors. With the protocol near-abandoned, the stability pool is likely underfunded, meaning NECT depeg events could go unchecked and hard-peg redemptions targeting undercollateralized dens could liquidate remaining users.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Beraborrow safe to use?
What are the main risks of using Beraborrow?
What is Beraborrow's risk score breakdown?
How does Beraborrow compare to other CDP protocols?
Has Beraborrow ever been hacked or exploited?
Get risk alerts before it's too late
Weekly grade changes, downgrade alerts, and new protocol risk findings. Free.