Elevated risk — five confirmed 51% attacks in 2021, critically thin security budget from minority SHA-256 status, and declining ecosystem vitality after Craig Wright controversy.
Risk Breakdown
Top Risks
Bitcoin SV suffered five confirmed 51% attacks between June and August 2021, carried out by an entity using the pseudonym 'Zulupool.' The August attack lasted approximately 12 hours and achieved a 14-block reorganization, with three competing chain versions being mined simultaneously. Double-spend attempts were confirmed during these attacks.
As a SHA-256 fork competing with Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash for mining hashrate, BSV commands a tiny fraction of total SHA-256 mining power. The cost of renting sufficient hashrate to execute a 51% attack on BSV is orders of magnitude lower than for Bitcoin, making repeat attacks economically feasible.
The Craig Wright / Satoshi Nakamoto controversy has damaged BSV's credibility and led to exchange delistings. The March 2024 UK High Court ruling that Craig Wright is not Satoshi Nakamoto further undermined BSV's narrative. Community is fragmented and ecosystem activity has declined significantly.
Post-April 2024 halving (reward now 3.125 BSV), the security budget is critically thin given BSV's low market cap and minimal transaction fee revenue. This makes future 51% attacks increasingly affordable.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Bitcoin SV safe to use?
What are the main risks of using Bitcoin SV?
What is Bitcoin SV's risk score breakdown?
How does Bitcoin SV compare to other L1 protocols?
Has Bitcoin SV ever been hacked or exploited?
Get risk alerts before it's too late
Weekly grade changes, downgrade alerts, and new protocol risk findings. Free.