CamelotMicro-cap
Moderate risk — strong Arbitrum ecosystem position but closed-source code and no bug bounty create a blind spot for security
Top Risks
1
No public GitHub codebase and no bug bounty program limit independent security review and vulnerability discovery
2
Concentrated liquidity V3 AMM relies on Algebra V2 implementation, inheriting third-party dependency risk
3
Extremely low GRAIL circulating supply (18K of 73K total) creates thin governance token liquidity and price manipulation risk
Risk Breakdown
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Camelot safe to use?
Camelot receives a B risk grade (24/100) from Hindenrank, where lower scores indicate lower risk. Moderate risk — strong Arbitrum ecosystem position but closed-source code and no bug bounty create a blind spot for security The main decentralized exchange on Arbitrum, offering token swaps and liquidity pools with about $100M in deposits. Over 75 partner protocols use it for liquidity. Its B- grade reflects a closed-source codebase with no bug bounty program, meaning security researchers have no incentive to find bugs before hackers do.
What are the main risks of using Camelot?
The key risks identified for Camelot are: (1) The code is not public and there is no bug bounty program. If someone finds a vulnerability, they have every incentive to exploit it rather than report it (2) The trading engine relies on Algebra V2, a third-party library. A bug in Algebra would directly drain Camelot's pools, similar to how Curve lost $73M from a compiler bug (3) Only 18,386 GRAIL tokens circulate out of 73,506 total. This thin liquidity means a small buyer could manipulate the governance token price or capture the protocol cheaply
What is Camelot's risk score breakdown?
Camelot scores 24/100 across eight risk dimensions: Mechanism Novelty: 0/15, Interaction Severity: 6/20, Oracle Surface: 0/10, Documentation Gaps: 4/10, Track Record: 0/15, Scale Exposure: 5/10, Regulatory Risk: 2/10, Vitality Risk: 7/10. The highest risk area is Vitality Risk at 7/10.
How does Camelot compare to other DEX protocols?
Among 111 rated DEX protocols on Hindenrank, Camelot ranks #12 by safety (lowest risk score = safest). Its 24/100 risk score and B grade place it among the safer DEX protocols.
Has Camelot ever been hacked or exploited?
Camelot scores 0/15 on the Track Record risk dimension, indicating no significant exploits or security incidents in its history. However, past performance does not guarantee future security.
Last scanned 2026-02-12