Moderate risk — connects 50+ chains but all security depends on a single validator set whose economic incentives may not hold under stress
Risk Breakdown
Top Risks
SGN (State Guardian Network) uses Tendermint PoS with CELR staking, but economic security depends on whether staked CELR value exceeds potential profit from attacking the bridge; if not, validators can profitably collude to drain liquidity pools
cBridge and Celer IM route all cross-chain messages through SGN validators; if 2/3+ of validators are compromised (economic attack, regulatory coercion, or coordinated exploit), entire multi-chain ecosystem is vulnerable to message forgery
Optimistic rollup protection (delay buffer + watchtower) is opt-in and requires dApps to run independent infrastructure; if watchtowers fail or are compromised, the optimistic security layer provides no protection
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Celer Network safe to use?
What are the main risks of using Celer Network?
What is Celer Network's risk score breakdown?
How does Celer Network compare to other Bridge protocols?
Has Celer Network ever been hacked or exploited?
Get risk alerts before it's too late
Weekly grade changes, downgrade alerts, and new protocol risk findings. Free.