Leaderboard/Centrifuge

Centrifuge

B-RiskC+Value|$1.2BTVL$82MFDV|RWAWebsite →

Moderate risk — pioneering real-world lending on-chain at $1.4B scale, but loan defaults are messy and recovery depends on off-chain courts, not code

Top Risks

1

Real-world asset counterparty and default risk is inherently opaque on-chain; 2023 default event exposed originator vetting weaknesses

2

Tokenized private credit relies on off-chain legal agreements for recourse, creating jurisdictional enforcement uncertainty

3

Transition from Polkadot parachain to multi-EVM (Ethereum, Base, Avalanche) introduces migration and bridge complexity

Risk Breakdown

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Centrifuge safe to use?
Centrifuge receives a B- risk grade (33/100) from Hindenrank, where lower scores indicate lower risk. Moderate risk — pioneering real-world lending on-chain at $1.4B scale, but loan defaults are messy and recovery depends on off-chain courts, not code A platform that brings real-world loans onto the blockchain, letting you invest in private credit like business loans and invoices. It manages $1.4B and has raised $54M in funding. Its C+ grade reflects the reality that when borrowers default, recovery depends on lawyers in foreign countries, not smart contracts.
What are the main risks of using Centrifuge?
The key risks identified for Centrifuge are: (1) These are real loans to real companies. A 2023 default already showed the vetting process had weaknesses. If several borrowers fail at once, even the 'safe' senior tranche loses money (2) The on-chain price tracker can show your loan is worth $1 even when the borrower has stopped paying. You could be trapped while informed investors quietly exit at full value (3) If a borrower defaults, you need lawyers in their country to chase the money. Cross-border legal recovery can take years and often returns pennies on the dollar
What is Centrifuge's risk score breakdown?
Centrifuge scores 33/100 across eight risk dimensions: Mechanism Novelty: 6/15, Interaction Severity: 6/20, Oracle Surface: 2/10, Documentation Gaps: 2/10, Track Record: 3/15, Scale Exposure: 7/10, Regulatory Risk: 7/10, Vitality Risk: 0/10. The highest risk area is Scale Exposure at 7/10.
How does Centrifuge compare to other RWA protocols?
Among 72 rated RWA protocols on Hindenrank, Centrifuge ranks #23 by safety (lowest risk score = safest). Its 33/100 risk score and B- grade place it among the safer RWA protocols.
Has Centrifuge ever been hacked or exploited?
Centrifuge scores 3/15 on the Track Record risk dimension, indicating some history of security incidents or exploits. Higher scores reflect more severe or frequent incidents. Review the full risk report for details.
Last scanned 2026-02-12