DigiFT offers a regulated, institutional-grade approach to RWA tokenization with meaningful dual-jurisdiction licensing. However, it inherits traditional custodial risks while adding DeFi composability complexity. The permissioned model limits liquidity but provides regulatory clarity. Moderate risk profile suitable for institutional RWA exposure.
Risk Breakdown
Top Risks
Centralized custody of underlying RWA assets (US Treasuries, bank bonds, MMFs) introduces counterparty risk if custodians fail or freeze assets
Regulatory concentration — dual MAS/SFC licensing means adverse regulatory action in either Singapore or Hong Kong could halt operations
Permissioned token transfer restrictions limit secondary market liquidity, creating potential redemption bottlenecks during market stress
Frequently Asked Questions
Is DigiFT safe to use?
What are the main risks of using DigiFT?
What is DigiFT's risk score breakdown?
How does DigiFT compare to other RWA protocols?
Has DigiFT ever been hacked or exploited?
Get risk alerts before it's too late
Weekly grade changes, downgrade alerts, and new protocol risk findings. Free.