DigiFT offers a regulated, institutional-grade approach to RWA tokenization with meaningful dual-jurisdiction licensing. However, it inherits traditional custodial risks while adding DeFi composability complexity. The permissioned model limits liquidity but provides regulatory clarity. Moderate risk profile suitable for institutional RWA exposure.
Top Risks
1
Centralized custody of underlying RWA assets (US Treasuries, bank bonds, MMFs) introduces counterparty risk if custodians fail or freeze assets
2
Regulatory concentration — dual MAS/SFC licensing means adverse regulatory action in either Singapore or Hong Kong could halt operations
3
Permissioned token transfer restrictions limit secondary market liquidity, creating potential redemption bottlenecks during market stress
Risk Breakdown
Frequently Asked Questions
Is DigiFT safe to use?
DigiFT receives a B- risk grade (34/100) from Hindenrank, where lower scores indicate lower risk. DigiFT offers a regulated, institutional-grade approach to RWA tokenization with meaningful dual-jurisdiction licensing. However, it inherits traditional custodial risks while adding DeFi composability complexity. The permissioned model limits liquidity but provides regulatory clarity. Moderate risk profile suitable for institutional RWA exposure. DigiFT is a regulated exchange for tokenized real-world assets (US Treasuries, bank bonds, money market funds) licensed by both Singapore's MAS and Hong Kong's SFC. It enables institutional investors to buy, sell, and use tokenized securities on-chain, with recent integrations allowing these tokens to serve as DeFi collateral.
What are the main risks of using DigiFT?
The key risks identified for DigiFT are: (1) Assets are held by traditional custodians — if a custodian fails, your tokens may not be immediately redeemable (2) KYC requirements mean you need to be verified to trade, limiting who can buy your tokens if you need to sell (3) Regulatory changes in Singapore or Hong Kong could restrict platform operations
What is DigiFT's risk score breakdown?
DigiFT scores 34/100 across eight risk dimensions: Mechanism Novelty: 5/15, Interaction Severity: 6/20, Oracle Surface: 3/10, Documentation Gaps: 2/10, Track Record: 2/15, Scale Exposure: 5/10, Regulatory Risk: 8/10, Vitality Risk: 3/10. The highest risk area is Regulatory Risk at 8/10.
How does DigiFT compare to other RWA protocols?
Among 72 rated RWA protocols on Hindenrank, DigiFT ranks #28 by safety (lowest risk score = safest). Its 34/100 risk score and B- grade place it in the middle tier of RWA protocols.
Has DigiFT ever been hacked or exploited?
DigiFT scores 2/15 on the Track Record risk dimension, indicating some history of security incidents or exploits. Higher scores reflect more severe or frequent incidents. Review the full risk report for details.