Interesting mechanism design and real MEV yield, but the thin liquidity and apxETH loss-absorption mean this is a sophisticated product for sophisticated users.
Risk Breakdown
Top Risks
1
pxETH buffer model separates staked ETH from redeemable ETH; under extreme redemption pressure the buffer can be depleted, forcing users into slower validator exits
2
Dual-token design (pxETH + apxETH) adds complexity; yield-seeking apxETH holders absorb more of validator risk than pxETH holders
3
Redacted Cartel connection (formerly BTRFLY) ties Dinero's governance and incentive mix to a contentious prior DAO lineage
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Dinero safe to use?
Dinero receives a C risk grade (44/100) from Hindenrank, where lower scores indicate lower risk. Interesting mechanism design and real MEV yield, but the thin liquidity and apxETH loss-absorption mean this is a sophisticated product for sophisticated users. Dinero (Pirex ETH) is a boutique ETH LST with a novel two-token design: pxETH is the plain 1:1 wrapper, apxETH is the yield-bearing version that also absorbs all slashing losses. A liquid ETH buffer services redemptions without waiting for validator exits, and the Redacted Relayer RPC captures MEV for yield. At ~$90M TVL it sits in the long tail of ETH LSTs, with less liquidity and DeFi integration than Lido/Rocket Pool/Frax. Governance and ecosystem overlap with the Redacted Cartel (ex-BTRFLY) lineage, which some users view favourably and others do not.
What are the main risks of using Dinero?
The key risks identified for Dinero are: (1) Buffer is finite — under heavy redemption pressure you could be queued for multi-day validator exits (2) apxETH holders absorb 100% of slashing losses while pxETH holders are insulated; easy to misread (3) Thin pxETH DEX liquidity amplifies depeg under stress (4) Redacted Cartel governance lineage carries reputational baggage for some (5) Protocol is small relative to Lido/Rocket Pool so resilience track record is limited
What is Dinero's risk score breakdown?
Dinero scores 44/100 across eight risk dimensions: Mechanism Novelty: 8/15, Interaction Severity: 9/20, Oracle Surface: 5/10, Documentation Gaps: 5/10, Track Record: 6/15, Scale Exposure: 3/10, Regulatory Risk: 4/10, Vitality Risk: 4/10. The highest risk area is Mechanism Novelty at 8/15.
How does Dinero compare to other Liquid Staking protocols?
Among 83 rated Liquid Staking protocols on Hindenrank, Dinero ranks #77 by safety (lowest risk score = safest). Its 44/100 risk score and C grade place it among the riskier Liquid Staking protocols.
Has Dinero ever been hacked or exploited?
Dinero scores 6/15 on the Track Record risk dimension, indicating some history of security incidents or exploits. Higher scores reflect more severe or frequent incidents. Review the full risk report for details.
Last scanned 2026-04-19
Get risk alerts before it's too late
Weekly grade changes, downgrade alerts, and new protocol risk findings. Free.