//Everclear
C-

Everclear

Risk Score 52/100·DValue
Compare
$30MTVL·BridgeWebsite →

Genuinely interesting architecture for chain abstraction but still early — use for smaller cross-chain flows where the efficiency gain is worth the novelty risk.

Risk Breakdown

Top Risks

1

Everclear (formerly Connext) rebranded and pivoted to intent-based 'clearing layer' — pivot history means the current product is relatively new and less battle-tested than the TVL might suggest

2

Intent/solver architecture assumes competing solvers will always find optimal fills; under stress or solver collusion, users can receive worse-than-expected execution

3

Connext Amarok contracts had a governance/upgrade vulnerability disclosed in 2023; Everclear's contract stack carries inherited complexity

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Everclear safe to use?
Everclear receives a C- risk grade (52/100) from Hindenrank, where lower scores indicate lower risk. Genuinely interesting architecture for chain abstraction but still early — use for smaller cross-chain flows where the efficiency gain is worth the novelty risk. Everclear is the rebrand + pivot of Connext into a 'clearing layer' for intent-based bridges. Instead of locking-and-minting or pooling liquidity per route, Everclear lets solvers front user capital and then periodically nets solver positions across chains on its own netting chain. The design drastically reduces bridge volume when solvers are healthy. ~$30M TVL directly, but billions in cumulative intent volume. Novel architecture means novel failure modes: solver market thinness, netting engine correctness, Hyperlane messaging dependencies, and inherited Connext contract complexity are all first-order risks.
What are the main risks of using Everclear?
The key risks identified for Everclear are: (1) Novel clearing-layer architecture is unbattle-tested under sustained stress (2) User experience depends on solver market liquidity — thin routes can have poor pricing or failed fills (3) Connext->Everclear pivot means accumulated codebase complexity in a small team (4) Netting engine is a new trust assumption; bugs or compromise could strand solver capital (5) Hyperlane cross-chain messaging dependency inherits its validator-set security model
What is Everclear's risk score breakdown?
Everclear scores 52/100 across eight risk dimensions: Mechanism Novelty: 12/15, Interaction Severity: 10/20, Oracle Surface: 5/10, Documentation Gaps: 6/10, Track Record: 7/15, Scale Exposure: 3/10, Regulatory Risk: 4/10, Vitality Risk: 5/10. The highest risk area is Mechanism Novelty at 12/15.
How does Everclear compare to other Bridge protocols?
Among 24 rated Bridge protocols on Hindenrank, Everclear ranks #20 by safety (lowest risk score = safest). Its 52/100 risk score and C- grade place it among the riskier Bridge protocols.
Has Everclear ever been hacked or exploited?
Everclear scores 7/15 on the Track Record risk dimension, indicating some history of security incidents or exploits. Higher scores reflect more severe or frequent incidents. Review the full risk report for details.
Last scanned 2026-04-19

Get risk alerts before it's too late

Weekly grade changes, downgrade alerts, and new protocol risk findings. Free.