//Falcon Finance
C+

Falcon Finance

Risk Score 42/100·C+Value
Compare
$1.6BTVL·$725MFDV·StablecoinWebsite →

Moderate risk — Ethena competitor with improving transparency framework but structural basis-trade and off-chain custody risks remain

Risk Breakdown

Top Risks

1

Basis-trade yield strategy depends on persistent positive funding rates — prolonged negative funding can erode collateral backing

2

Off-chain custody and CEX counterparty exposure introduces opaque risks not fully mitigable on-chain

3

July 2025 USDf depeg (~80bps) caused by social media panic was contained; quarterly audit confirmed 103.87% backing, but tail risk of CEX counterparty failure remains

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Falcon Finance safe to use?
Falcon Finance receives a C+ risk grade (42/100) from Hindenrank, where lower scores indicate lower risk. Moderate risk — Ethena competitor with improving transparency framework but structural basis-trade and off-chain custody risks remain A synthetic dollar protocol backed by DWF Labs that earns yield from trading fee differences between spot and futures markets. It grew to $1.6B in deposits rapidly with $45M in funding. The July 2025 USDf depeg (~80bps) was contained, and an independent quarterly audit confirmed 103.87% backing. Its C grade reflects basis-trade structural risks and off-chain custody dependency.
What are the main risks of using Falcon Finance?
The key risks identified for Falcon Finance are: (1) The yield comes from trading fees staying positive. If they turn negative for weeks, the protocol bleeds money and the dollar peg can break — Falcon already experienced a small depeg in July 2025 (2) Your deposits are held off-chain by custodians. If the exchange holding the trading positions goes bankrupt (like FTX did), up to 30% of the backing could vanish overnight (3) Growing from zero to $1.6B in months means the system has limited stress-test history despite passing its first independent audit
What is Falcon Finance's risk score breakdown?
Falcon Finance scores 42/100 across eight risk dimensions: Mechanism Novelty: 5/15, Interaction Severity: 10/20, Oracle Surface: 2/10, Documentation Gaps: 4/10, Track Record: 5/15, Scale Exposure: 7/10, Regulatory Risk: 6/10, Vitality Risk: 3/10. The highest risk area is Scale Exposure at 7/10.
How does Falcon Finance compare to other Stablecoin protocols?
Among 29 rated Stablecoin protocols on Hindenrank, Falcon Finance ranks #16 by safety (lowest risk score = safest). Its 42/100 risk score and C+ grade place it in the middle tier of Stablecoin protocols.
Has Falcon Finance ever been hacked or exploited?
Falcon Finance scores 5/15 on the Track Record risk dimension, indicating some history of security incidents or exploits. Higher scores reflect more severe or frequent incidents. Review the full risk report for details.
Last scanned 2026-03-14

Get risk alerts before it's too late

Weekly grade changes, downgrade alerts, and new protocol risk findings. Free.