//Gauntlet
C+

Gauntlet

Risk Score 36/100·C+Value
Compare
$929MTVL·DeFiWebsite →

Moderate risk — competent risk manager with strong institutional moat, but single-firm dependency across $2B+ in curated vaults and dual-role governance conflict-of-interest are concentration concerns

Risk Breakdown

Top Risks

1

Gauntlet's simulation-based risk models curate $2B+ in vault AUM and inform parameters for protocols with $35B+ in monitored assets — models calibrated on historical data may fail catastrophically during tail events outside observed volatility ranges

2

Centralized parameter control creates a single point of failure; Gauntlet simultaneously curates its own Morpho vaults and advises Compound DAO on protocol parameters, creating governance conflict-of-interest concerns that community critics have raised publicly

3

Performance-based incentive model (renewed Sept 2025) aligns Gauntlet with preventing insolvencies but creates moral hazard: overly conservative parameters reduce capital efficiency across 80+ curated vaults, while overly aggressive parameters risk catastrophic failure at $2B+ AUM scale

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Gauntlet safe to use?
Gauntlet receives a C+ risk grade (36/100) from Hindenrank, where lower scores indicate lower risk. Moderate risk — competent risk manager with strong institutional moat, but single-firm dependency across $2B+ in curated vaults and dual-role governance conflict-of-interest are concentration concerns A risk management firm that uses simulations to set safety parameters (collateral ratios, lending limits) for DeFi protocols like Morpho and Compound, while directly managing $2B+ in curated lending vaults across 80+ markets. Institutional clients include Gemini, Wirex, BTCS (Nasdaq-listed), and SCRYPT (Swiss FINMA-regulated). Its B- grade reflects strong track record offset by the concentration of control in one firm's models and governance conflict-of-interest concerns.
What are the main risks of using Gauntlet?
The key risks identified for Gauntlet are: (1) If Gauntlet's models fail to predict a black swan crash, the safety settings on Morpho and Compound could all be wrong at the same time, causing billions in bad debt across 80+ curated vaults (2) One company controls the risk settings for major lending protocols in DeFi. If Gauntlet is compromised or bribed, an attacker could drain multiple protocols simultaneously (3) Gauntlet gets paid for preventing losses, creating pressure to be either too conservative (hurting your returns) or too aggressive (risking catastrophic failure)
What is Gauntlet's risk score breakdown?
Gauntlet scores 36/100 across eight risk dimensions: Mechanism Novelty: 3/15, Interaction Severity: 9/20, Oracle Surface: 0/10, Documentation Gaps: 2/10, Track Record: 6/15, Scale Exposure: 7/10, Regulatory Risk: 5/10, Vitality Risk: 4/10. The highest risk area is Scale Exposure at 7/10.
How does Gauntlet compare to other DeFi protocols?
Among 68 rated DeFi protocols on Hindenrank, Gauntlet ranks #33 by safety (lowest risk score = safest). Its 36/100 risk score and C+ grade place it in the middle tier of DeFi protocols.
Has Gauntlet ever been hacked or exploited?
Gauntlet scores 6/15 on the Track Record risk dimension, indicating some history of security incidents or exploits. Higher scores reflect more severe or frequent incidents. Review the full risk report for details.
Last scanned 2026-03-12

Get risk alerts before it's too late

Weekly grade changes, downgrade alerts, and new protocol risk findings. Free.