//Giza
C+

GizaMicro-cap

Risk Score 42/100·C-Value
Compare
$14,000TVL·$1MFDV·DeFiWebsite →

Elevated risk — product reset after ARMA/Pulse sunset leaves Giza in early restart mode with no audits, near-zero TVL, and an unproven new product.

Risk Breakdown

Top Risks

1

Product discontinuity: ARMA and Pulse agents were sunset in February 2026 with all user funds returned, collapsing TVL from $4M to under $15K; the replacement unified Giza Agent has not yet demonstrated meaningful adoption

2

No formal security audits for the current Giza Agent product despite managing user funds through session-key authorization mechanisms

3

Near-zero TVL ($14K) and negligible revenue ($58 in 30 days) raise sustainability concerns, and multi-protocol exposure through yield optimization creates cascading risk if any integrated protocol is exploited

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Giza safe to use?
Giza receives a C+ risk grade (42/100) from Hindenrank, where lower scores indicate lower risk. Elevated risk — product reset after ARMA/Pulse sunset leaves Giza in early restart mode with no audits, near-zero TVL, and an unproven new product. Giza is an autonomous AI agent protocol that let users deploy non-custodial AI agents to optimize DeFi yield strategies across multiple chains. In February 2026 the team sunset its legacy ARMA and Pulse agents, returning all user funds, and consolidated into a unified Giza Agent product. TVL has collapsed from $4M to under $15K as a result. With $8.2M in total funding but negligible current TVL and $58 in 30-day revenue, Giza receives a C grade reflecting the operational reset, absence of formal security audits, and unproven traction for the new product.
What are the main risks of using Giza?
The key risks identified for Giza are: (1) Legacy ARMA and Pulse agents were shut down in February 2026 with all user funds returned; the replacement Giza Agent product is effectively a restart with no demonstrated adoption at this stage (2) No formal security audits for the current product despite managing user funds through novel session-key authorization mechanisms (3) Near-zero TVL and negligible revenue ($58/30d) indicate the protocol has not yet achieved product-market fit after the transition
What is Giza's risk score breakdown?
Giza scores 42/100 across eight risk dimensions: Mechanism Novelty: 9/15, Interaction Severity: 8/20, Oracle Surface: 5/10, Documentation Gaps: 4/10, Track Record: 6/15, Scale Exposure: 0/10, Regulatory Risk: 3/10, Vitality Risk: 7/10. The highest risk area is Vitality Risk at 7/10.
How does Giza compare to other DeFi protocols?
Among 69 rated DeFi protocols on Hindenrank, Giza ranks #57 by safety (lowest risk score = safest). Its 42/100 risk score and C+ grade place it among the riskier DeFi protocols.
Has Giza ever been hacked or exploited?
Giza scores 6/15 on the Track Record risk dimension, indicating some history of security incidents or exploits. Higher scores reflect more severe or frequent incidents. Review the full risk report for details.
Last scanned 2026-06-14

Get risk alerts before it's too late

Weekly grade changes, downgrade alerts, and new protocol risk findings. Free.