//Hedera
C+

Hedera

Risk Score 36/100·DValue
Compare
$60MTVL·$4.5BFDV·L1Website →

Hedera's Governing Council structure enables rapid response to incidents — both the 2023 and 2026 HTS precompile exploits were patched within hours. However, the same attack vector exploited twice in three years on different third-party protocols indicates a systemic interface risk that periodic patches have not resolved. Enterprise adoption (IBM, Boeing, LG) provides a credible use-case moat, but the DeFi ecosystem's reliance on a precompile architecture with two confirmed exploits limits upside until the underlying interface design is formally audited and hardened.

Risk Breakdown

Top Risks

1

Recurring HTS precompile exploit surface — two smart contract exploits (March 2023 SaucerSwap ~$570K, March 2026 DeFi protocols ~$600K) both exploited the HTS token association precompile interface; same attack vector recurring three years apart on different applications indicates a systemic design risk that periodic patching has not resolved

2

Patented technology — the hashgraph consensus algorithm is patented by Swirlds Inc., creating intellectual property dependency and preventing the open-source fork-ability that other L1s offer as a decentralization backstop

3

Council member concentration — a coordinated decision by a subset of the 28 Council members could alter network parameters, governance rules, or even halt operations, as all consensus nodes are operated by these entities

4

DeFi ecosystem remains small at approximately $60M TVL despite the network being live since 2019, with SaucerSwap accounting for over two-thirds of total DeFi liquidity

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Hedera safe to use?
Hedera receives a C+ risk grade (36/100) from Hindenrank, where lower scores indicate lower risk. Hedera's Governing Council structure enables rapid response to incidents — both the 2023 and 2026 HTS precompile exploits were patched within hours. However, the same attack vector exploited twice in three years on different third-party protocols indicates a systemic interface risk that periodic patches have not resolved. Enterprise adoption (IBM, Boeing, LG) provides a credible use-case moat, but the DeFi ecosystem's reliance on a precompile architecture with two confirmed exploits limits upside until the underlying interface design is formally audited and hardened. Hedera is a public distributed ledger using the patented hashgraph consensus algorithm, governed by a council of 28 major enterprises including Google, IBM, and Boeing. With approximately $60M in DeFi TVL and a $5B fully diluted valuation, it has been operational since September 2019 with strong theoretical security (aBFT consensus) but limited DeFi adoption. Its B- grade reflects a clean track record with only one smart contract exploit in 2023 (quickly contained), balanced against significant centralization in its Council-operated consensus model and a large valuation-to-TVL gap that creates scale exposure risk.
What are the main risks of using Hedera?
The key risks identified for Hedera are: (1) All consensus nodes are operated exclusively by 28 Governing Council members (enterprises like Google, IBM, Boeing), making Hedera effectively a permissioned network despite being called public (2) The hashgraph consensus algorithm is patented by Swirlds Inc., creating intellectual property dependency that prevents the open-source fork-ability typical of other L1 blockchains (3) DeFi ecosystem remains small at approximately $60M TVL after 5+ years of operation, with over two-thirds concentrated in a single protocol (SaucerSwap) (4) HBAR stakers earn rewards but have no governance influence — only the 28 Council members control network parameters and decisions
What is Hedera's risk score breakdown?
Hedera scores 36/100 across eight risk dimensions: Mechanism Novelty: 3/15, Interaction Severity: 4/20, Oracle Surface: 0/10, Documentation Gaps: 2/10, Track Record: 8/15, Scale Exposure: 7/10, Regulatory Risk: 6/10, Vitality Risk: 6/10. The highest risk area is Scale Exposure at 7/10.
How does Hedera compare to other L1 protocols?
Among 56 rated L1 protocols on Hindenrank, Hedera ranks #33 by safety (lowest risk score = safest). Its 36/100 risk score and C+ grade place it in the middle tier of L1 protocols.
Has Hedera ever been hacked or exploited?
Hedera scores 8/15 on the Track Record risk dimension, indicating some history of security incidents or exploits. Higher scores reflect more severe or frequent incidents. Review the full risk report for details.
Last scanned 2026-04-17

Get risk alerts before it's too late

Weekly grade changes, downgrade alerts, and new protocol risk findings. Free.