//Hyperliquid
C-

Hyperliquid

Risk Score 56/100·B-Value
Compare
$5.2BTVL·$58.9BFDV·DerivativesWebsite →

Elevated risk — dominant perp DEX with persistent 2025 security incidents, an expanding third-party oracle surface via HIP-3 builder perps, and escalating regulatory scrutiny from tokenized equity perpetual listings

Risk Breakdown

Top Risks

1

Custom L1 with limited validator set creates centralization and censorship risk; team demonstrated unilateral intervention capability during the JELLY delisting

2

HIP-3 builder-deployed perpetuals expand the oracle and manipulation surface to third-party deployers with custom oracle sources and market definitions

3

Tokenized equity perpetuals (e.g., HOOD perps) face direct SEC/CFTC scrutiny; insider-trading allegations surfaced April 2026 signal escalating regulatory attention

4

HLP vault socializes losses across depositors; multiple security incidents in 2025 — JELLY manipulation ($13.5M), $21M private key exploit, Hyperdrive/HyperVault exploits — establish a pattern of recurring vulnerabilities

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Hyperliquid safe to use?
Hyperliquid receives a C- risk grade (56/100) from Hindenrank, where lower scores indicate lower risk. Elevated risk — dominant perp DEX with persistent 2025 security incidents, an expanding third-party oracle surface via HIP-3 builder perps, and escalating regulatory scrutiny from tokenized equity perpetual listings A perpetual futures exchange running on its own custom blockchain, offering up to 50x leverage with a full on-chain order book. It holds $5.2B in deposits and has no outside investors. Its C- grade reflects multiple security incidents throughout 2025 — including the $13.5M JELLY exploit, a $21M private key compromise, and several vault exploits — plus centralization concerns from a small validator set, and expanding regulatory scrutiny as the platform now lists perpetuals on tokenized stocks.
What are the main risks of using Hyperliquid?
The key risks identified for Hyperliquid are: (1) In March 2025, a trader manipulated an illiquid token listing to extract $13.5M from the shared vault. The team had to forcibly delist the market, showing they can and will intervene unilaterally (2) The blockchain runs on only 16-25 validators. If enough go offline or are pressured by regulators, your open trades are stuck and you cannot manage your positions during a crash (3) HIP-3 allows third parties to deploy their own perpetual markets on Hyperliquid infrastructure with custom price oracles. If a builder deploys a market with a manipulable oracle, losses could cascade through the shared vault (4) The platform now offers perpetual trading on tokenized stocks (e.g., HOOD). This is drawing regulatory attention from the SEC and CFTC — insider-trading allegations surfaced in April 2026. A regulatory action could restrict or shut down equity derivative trading for all users
What is Hyperliquid's risk score breakdown?
Hyperliquid scores 56/100 across eight risk dimensions: Mechanism Novelty: 3/15, Interaction Severity: 8/20, Oracle Surface: 7/10, Documentation Gaps: 3/10, Track Record: 12/15, Scale Exposure: 10/10, Regulatory Risk: 7/10, Vitality Risk: 6/10. The highest risk area is Scale Exposure at 10/10.
How does Hyperliquid compare to other Derivatives protocols?
Among 56 rated Derivatives protocols on Hindenrank, Hyperliquid ranks #54 by safety (lowest risk score = safest). Its 56/100 risk score and C- grade place it among the riskier Derivatives protocols.
Has Hyperliquid ever been hacked or exploited?
Hyperliquid scores 12/15 on the Track Record risk dimension, indicating some history of security incidents or exploits. Higher scores reflect more severe or frequent incidents. Review the full risk report for details.

Incident History

1incident|$37,000total losses
Last scanned 2026-05-03

Get risk alerts before it's too late

Weekly grade changes, downgrade alerts, and new protocol risk findings. Free.