//Hyperliquid
C-

Hyperliquid

Risk Score 55/100·BValue
Compare
$5.2BTVL·$52.5BFDV·DerivativesWebsite →

Elevated risk — dominant perp DEX facing direct institutional regulatory pressure for mandatory CFTC registration, expanded oracle surface from tokenized equity perps at $2.5B OI and Ondo Finance collateral, alongside a recurring 2025 security incident pattern

Risk Breakdown

Top Risks

1

CME Group and ICE formally lobbied CFTC (May 2026) to mandate Hyperliquid register as a derivatives exchange with KYC and trade surveillance; the platform was also used as a laundering passthrough in the May 2026 THORChain exploit, reinforcing the sanctions evasion narrative regulators have advanced

2

Custom L1 with limited validator set (27 nodes) creates centralization and censorship risk; team demonstrated unilateral intervention capability during the JELLY delisting

3

HIP-3 tokenized equity perps ($2.5B+ OI) and Ondo Finance tokenized ETF collateral expand oracle dependencies to third-party equity price feeds and external protocol risk not present in the original perp infrastructure

4

HLP vault socializes losses across depositors; multiple security incidents in 2025 — JELLY manipulation ($13.5M), $21M private key exploit, Hyperdrive/HyperVault exploits — establish a pattern of recurring vulnerabilities

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Hyperliquid safe to use?
Hyperliquid receives a C- risk grade (55/100) from Hindenrank, where lower scores indicate lower risk. Elevated risk — dominant perp DEX facing direct institutional regulatory pressure for mandatory CFTC registration, expanded oracle surface from tokenized equity perps at $2.5B OI and Ondo Finance collateral, alongside a recurring 2025 security incident pattern A perpetual futures exchange running on its own custom blockchain, offering up to 50x leverage with a full on-chain order book. It holds over $5B in deposits and now offers perpetuals on tokenized stocks and commodities. Its D+ grade reflects multiple security incidents throughout 2025, centralization concerns from a small validator set, escalating institutional regulatory pressure (CME and ICE formally lobbied the CFTC for mandatory Hyperliquid registration in May 2026), and new oracle dependencies from Ondo Finance tokenized ETF collateral.
What are the main risks of using Hyperliquid?
The key risks identified for Hyperliquid are: (1) In March 2025, a trader manipulated an illiquid token listing to extract $13.5M from the shared vault. The team had to forcibly delist the market, showing they can and will intervene unilaterally (2) The blockchain runs on only 27 validators. If enough go offline or are pressured by regulators, your open trades are stuck and you cannot manage your positions during a crash (3) In May 2026, CME Group and ICE (NYSE parent) formally asked the CFTC to make Hyperliquid register like a traditional exchange, with mandatory KYC and trade surveillance. If this succeeds, the platform may need to block US users or restructure entirely (4) Ondo Finance tokenized ETFs (SPYon, NVDAon) can now be used as collateral for trades. If those products lose their peg or face a smart contract exploit, your margin collateral could be worth less than expected, triggering forced liquidations
What is Hyperliquid's risk score breakdown?
Hyperliquid scores 55/100 across eight risk dimensions: Mechanism Novelty: 3/15, Interaction Severity: 9/20, Oracle Surface: 8/10, Documentation Gaps: 3/10, Track Record: 12/15, Scale Exposure: 10/10, Regulatory Risk: 8/10, Vitality Risk: 2/10. The highest risk area is Scale Exposure at 10/10.
How does Hyperliquid compare to other Derivatives protocols?
Among 57 rated Derivatives protocols on Hindenrank, Hyperliquid ranks #54 by safety (lowest risk score = safest). Its 55/100 risk score and C- grade place it among the riskier Derivatives protocols.
Has Hyperliquid ever been hacked or exploited?
Hyperliquid scores 12/15 on the Track Record risk dimension, indicating some history of security incidents or exploits. Higher scores reflect more severe or frequent incidents. Review the full risk report for details.

Incident History

1incident|$37,000total losses
Last scanned 2026-05-30

Get risk alerts before it's too late

Weekly grade changes, downgrade alerts, and new protocol risk findings. Free.