Leaderboard/Infrared

InfraredMicro-cap

B-RiskCValue|$84MTVL$43MFDV|Liquid StakingWebsite →

Moderate risk — dominant position on a brand-new chain whose core economic mechanism has zero track record

Top Risks

1

Deep dependency on Berachain's novel and untested Proof of Liquidity consensus — if PoL fails, Infrared's entire value proposition collapses

2

Validator concentration risk: Infrared operates its own validator set, creating single-point-of-failure for $1.6B in delegated assets

3

iBGT depeg risk amplified by thin Berachain DeFi liquidity — a 5% depeg could cascade through leveraged positions across the ecosystem

Risk Breakdown

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Infrared safe to use?
Infrared receives a B- risk grade (30/100) from Hindenrank, where lower scores indicate lower risk. Moderate risk — dominant position on a brand-new chain whose core economic mechanism has zero track record The largest protocol on Berachain, wrapping the chain's unique proof-of-liquidity rewards into liquid tokens (iBGT, iBERA) you can use across DeFi. It manages $1.6B with $16.5M in funding. Its C+ grade reflects deep dependency on Berachain's untested consensus mechanism and validator concentration.
What are the main risks of using Infrared?
The key risks identified for Infrared are: (1) Everything depends on Berachain's novel proof-of-liquidity system working correctly. If that mechanism breaks, Infrared's tokens become worthless wrappers around nothing (2) Infrared runs its own validator set controlling a large share of Berachain's security. A slashing event or validator failure hits all $1.6B in delegated assets (3) iBGT can lose its peg on the thin Berachain trading markets. A 5% depeg triggers liquidations across every lending protocol using iBGT as collateral, deepening the spiral
What is Infrared's risk score breakdown?
Infrared scores 30/100 across eight risk dimensions: Mechanism Novelty: 3/15, Interaction Severity: 8/20, Oracle Surface: 2/10, Documentation Gaps: 3/10, Track Record: 3/15, Scale Exposure: 3/10, Regulatory Risk: 3/10, Vitality Risk: 5/10. The highest risk area is Vitality Risk at 5/10.
How does Infrared compare to other Liquid Staking protocols?
Among 81 rated Liquid Staking protocols on Hindenrank, Infrared ranks #36 by safety (lowest risk score = safest). Its 30/100 risk score and B- grade place it in the middle tier of Liquid Staking protocols.
Has Infrared ever been hacked or exploited?
Infrared scores 3/15 on the Track Record risk dimension, indicating some history of security incidents or exploits. Higher scores reflect more severe or frequent incidents. Review the full risk report for details.
Last scanned 2026-02-26