Leaderboard/Lombard Finance

Lombard Finance

C+RiskD+Value|$716MTVL$1.1BFDV|Liquid StakingWebsite →

Moderate risk — record-breaking growth across 15 chains, but zero battle-testing and multiplicative bridge exposure

Top Risks

1

LBTC's 1:1 BTC backing depends entirely on Babylon's Bitcoin staking security; any slashing event or Babylon exploit directly depegs LBTC across all 15 integrated chains

2

Fastest-growing yield-bearing token in crypto history ($1B TVL in 92 days) means protocol mechanisms are severely under-battle-tested relative to scale and cross-chain exposure

3

15-chain deployment creates multiplicative bridge risk; a single bridge exploit can mint unbacked LBTC and poison the entire $1.7B supply

Risk Breakdown

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Lombard Finance safe to use?
Lombard Finance receives a C+ risk grade (42/100) from Hindenrank, where lower scores indicate lower risk. Moderate risk — record-breaking growth across 15 chains, but zero battle-testing and multiplicative bridge exposure A Bitcoin liquid staking protocol that turns your BTC into LBTC, an interest-earning token available on 15 different blockchains. It grew to $1.7B in just 92 days, the fastest growth of any yield-bearing token in crypto history. Its C+ grade reflects the risk that a single bridge hack on any of its 15 chains could mint fake LBTC and crash the entire system.
What are the main risks of using Lombard Finance?
The key risks identified for Lombard Finance are: (1) LBTC's value depends entirely on Babylon's Bitcoin staking security. If Babylon's validators misbehave or get exploited, your LBTC loses its 1:1 backing instantly. (2) LBTC exists on 15 blockchains. A bridge hack on any single chain can flood the market with fake LBTC, destroying trust across all 15. (3) Reached $1B in 92 days without surviving a single market crash. The protocol has never been stress-tested at scale.
What is Lombard Finance's risk score breakdown?
Lombard Finance scores 42/100 across eight risk dimensions: Mechanism Novelty: 3/15, Interaction Severity: 10/20, Oracle Surface: 3/10, Documentation Gaps: 3/10, Track Record: 4/15, Scale Exposure: 7/10, Regulatory Risk: 5/10, Vitality Risk: 7/10. The highest risk area is Scale Exposure at 7/10.
How does Lombard Finance compare to other Liquid Staking protocols?
Among 81 rated Liquid Staking protocols on Hindenrank, Lombard Finance ranks #74 by safety (lowest risk score = safest). Its 42/100 risk score and C+ grade place it among the riskier Liquid Staking protocols.
Has Lombard Finance ever been hacked or exploited?
Lombard Finance scores 4/15 on the Track Record risk dimension, indicating some history of security incidents or exploits. Higher scores reflect more severe or frequent incidents. Review the full risk report for details.
Last scanned 2026-02-26