//Lorenzo sUSD1+
C+

Lorenzo sUSD1+

Risk Score 42/100·D-Value
Compare
$84MTVL·$19MFDV·YieldWebsite →

Elevated risk — novel on-chain fund structure with opaque multi-strategy exposure, stale audit coverage, and dangerous governance token economics

Risk Breakdown

Top Risks

1

On-Chain Traded Fund (OTF) model combines RWA yields, DeFi strategies, and quantitative trading in opaque strategy layers — users cannot verify all underlying positions

2

sUSD1+ relies on USD1 stablecoin as base asset, inheriting all counterparty and regulatory risks of the underlying stablecoin issuer (USD1 demonstrated a brief 0.6% depeg in Feb 2026)

3

Cross-chain yield aggregation across multiple chains and strategies multiplies smart contract risk surface, with the most recent security audit (Zellic, April 2024) now over 2 years old

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Lorenzo sUSD1+ safe to use?
Lorenzo sUSD1+ receives a C+ risk grade (42/100) from Hindenrank, where lower scores indicate lower risk. Elevated risk — novel on-chain fund structure with opaque multi-strategy exposure, stale audit coverage, and dangerous governance token economics Lorenzo sUSD1+ is a yield-generating stablecoin product that earns returns by combining Real World Asset yields, DeFi lending, and quantitative trading strategies. You deposit USDC, USDT, or USD1 and receive sUSD1+ which grows in value as yields accumulate. The protocol aims to be like an on-chain investment fund. Its C grade reflects significant strategy opacity, a stale security audit, and governance token dilution risks.
What are the main risks of using Lorenzo sUSD1+?
The key risks identified for Lorenzo sUSD1+ are: (1) Your money is invested in a mix of DeFi, real-world assets, and trading strategies — you cannot see or verify all the positions your money is in, and the last security audit was over 2 years ago (2) sUSD1+ depends on USD1 stablecoin keeping its value — USD1 briefly lost its peg in February 2026 by 0.6%; a deeper depeg would directly hit your sUSD1+ value (3) The BANK governance token is worth far less than the money the protocol controls ($15M FDV vs $169M TVL), and a May 2026 vote approved increasing token supply by 21.66%, diluting holders further
What is Lorenzo sUSD1+'s risk score breakdown?
Lorenzo sUSD1+ scores 42/100 across eight risk dimensions: Mechanism Novelty: 8/15, Interaction Severity: 11/20, Oracle Surface: 4/10, Documentation Gaps: 5/10, Track Record: 4/15, Scale Exposure: 3/10, Regulatory Risk: 4/10, Vitality Risk: 3/10. The highest risk area is Interaction Severity at 11/20.
How does Lorenzo sUSD1+ compare to other Yield protocols?
Among 121 rated Yield protocols on Hindenrank, Lorenzo sUSD1+ ranks #86 by safety (lowest risk score = safest). Its 42/100 risk score and C+ grade place it among the riskier Yield protocols.
Has Lorenzo sUSD1+ ever been hacked or exploited?
Lorenzo sUSD1+ scores 4/15 on the Track Record risk dimension, indicating some history of security incidents or exploits. Higher scores reflect more severe or frequent incidents. Review the full risk report for details.
Last scanned 2026-05-30

Get risk alerts before it's too late

Weekly grade changes, downgrade alerts, and new protocol risk findings. Free.