Leaderboard/Meld Gold

Meld Gold

B-RiskCValue|$12MTVL|RWAWebsite →

Moderate risk — physically-backed gold tokenization with established custodial infrastructure, but off-chain dependency and limited Algorand DeFi depth constrain utility.

Top Risks

1

Physical gold and silver custody depends on off-chain vault operators and auditors — token holders must trust the custodial chain

2

Redemption of physical metals requires interaction with off-chain entities and may face delays or restrictions

3

Oracle dependency for precious metals pricing introduces stale price risk during volatile metals markets

4

Algorand ecosystem has limited DeFi depth, reducing composability and secondary market liquidity for GOLD/SILVER tokens

Risk Breakdown

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Meld Gold safe to use?
Meld Gold receives a B- risk grade (34/100) from Hindenrank, where lower scores indicate lower risk. Moderate risk — physically-backed gold tokenization with established custodial infrastructure, but off-chain dependency and limited Algorand DeFi depth constrain utility. Meld Gold tokenizes physical gold and silver on the Algorand blockchain, where each token represents one gram of metal stored in secure vaults. With $12M in TVL, it allows users to trade, lend, and redeem real precious metals on-chain. The platform integrates with Algorand DeFi protocols like Folks Finance for lending and borrowing.
What are the main risks of using Meld Gold?
The key risks identified for Meld Gold are: (1) Your tokens are only as safe as the physical gold in the vaults — you're trusting off-chain custodians and auditors to maintain 1:1 backing (2) Redeeming physical gold involves off-chain processes with potential delays and fees, which may not be instant (3) Limited to the Algorand ecosystem, which has less DeFi activity than larger chains, meaning fewer trading options
What is Meld Gold's risk score breakdown?
Meld Gold scores 34/100 across eight risk dimensions: Mechanism Novelty: 0/15, Interaction Severity: 3/20, Oracle Surface: 5/10, Documentation Gaps: 4/10, Track Record: 6/15, Scale Exposure: 3/10, Regulatory Risk: 8/10, Vitality Risk: 5/10. The highest risk area is Regulatory Risk at 8/10.
How does Meld Gold compare to other RWA protocols?
Among 72 rated RWA protocols on Hindenrank, Meld Gold ranks #29 by safety (lowest risk score = safest). Its 34/100 risk score and B- grade place it in the middle tier of RWA protocols.
Has Meld Gold ever been hacked or exploited?
Meld Gold scores 6/15 on the Track Record risk dimension, indicating some history of security incidents or exploits. Higher scores reflect more severe or frequent incidents. Review the full risk report for details.
Last scanned 2026-02-23