Elevated risk — market maker scandal, co-founder suspension, Coinbase delisting, and organizational restructuring create serious governance concerns on top of a centralized L2 with a novel unproven execution layer.
Risk Breakdown
Top Risks
Movement Labs experienced a major market maker scandal in 2025: an obscure middleman (Rentech) was granted control of 66 million MOVE tokens through a deal that experts said incentivized pump-and-dump behavior, resulting in a $38M token dump shortly after launch. Co-founder Rushi Manche was suspended, and the company rebranded as Move Industries.
Coinbase delisted MOVE in May 2025 due to failure to meet listing standards, sending the token to all-time lows and signaling severe concerns about the project's governance and tokenomics from a major exchange.
Movement operates with a centralized sequencer and proposer with no permissionless fraud proofs or forced-inclusion mechanism. Users must trust the operator to process transactions honestly and maintain liveness, with no independent exit mechanism.
The project has pivoted from an Ethereum L2 to a standalone L1 strategy, creating uncertainty about the long-term architecture. Multiple rebrands (Movement Labs to Move Industries) and leadership changes signal organizational instability.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Movement safe to use?
What are the main risks of using Movement?
What is Movement's risk score breakdown?
How does Movement compare to other L2 protocols?
Has Movement ever been hacked or exploited?
Get risk alerts before it's too late
Weekly grade changes, downgrade alerts, and new protocol risk findings. Free.