//Multichain (Backtest 2023-06-01)
D

Multichain (Backtest 2023-06-01)Micro-cap

Risk Score 72/100·D+Value
$44MTVL·$21MFDV·BridgeWebsite →

Very high risk — centralized key infrastructure contradicts decentralized security claims, with $1.5B at stake and a track record of exploits. The combination of opaque MPC node operations, China-based leadership, and ecosystem-critical dependency makes Multichain one of the highest systemic risks in DeFi.

Risk Breakdown

Top Risks

1

MPC key management relies on opaque node infrastructure with unverified operator diversity and no on-chain collateral requirements

2

Two prior exploits ($7.9M ECDSA key derivation in Jul 2021, $3M approval drain in Jan 2022) demonstrate recurring security failures

3

Critical single-point-of-failure risk: CEO controls cloud server infrastructure hosting MPC nodes, creating centralized custody despite decentralized claims

4

Massive honeypot ($1.5B TVL locked in bridge contracts) amplifies impact of any key compromise or operational failure

5

China-based team and leadership create elevated regulatory and operational risk given China's hostile crypto regulatory posture

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Multichain (Backtest 2023-06-01) safe to use?
Multichain (Backtest 2023-06-01) receives a D risk grade (72/100) from Hindenrank, where lower scores indicate lower risk. Very high risk — centralized key infrastructure contradicts decentralized security claims, with $1.5B at stake and a track record of exploits. The combination of opaque MPC node operations, China-based leadership, and ecosystem-critical dependency makes Multichain one of the highest systemic risks in DeFi. Multichain (formerly Anyswap) is the largest cross-chain bridge protocol, enabling token transfers across 40+ blockchains with approximately $1.5 billion in total value locked. The protocol uses Secure Multi-Party Computation (SMPC) for signing cross-chain transactions, claiming no single node holds a complete private key. However, critical centralization risks undermine this architecture: the CEO reportedly controls the cloud infrastructure hosting all MPC nodes, creating a single point of failure. The protocol has suffered two prior exploits — a $7.9M ECDSA vulnerability in July 2021 and a $3M approval-draining attack in January 2022 — raising serious concerns about code quality and operational security. The team is based in China, where cryptocurrency operations are illegal, adding significant regulatory and operational risk. With 80% of Fantom's stablecoins bridged through Multichain, a failure would cause devastating ecosystem-wide contagion.
What are the main risks of using Multichain (Backtest 2023-06-01)?
The key risks identified for Multichain (Backtest 2023-06-01) are: (1) CEO reportedly controls all MPC node infrastructure from a personal cloud account — single point of failure despite claims of decentralized key management (2) Two prior exploits totaling $11M in losses demonstrate recurring security vulnerabilities, including a basic ECDSA cryptographic error known since 2010 (3) China-based team operating in a jurisdiction where crypto is illegal — elevated risk of arrest, asset seizure, or forced shutdown (4) Massive $1.5B honeypot in bridge contracts makes Multichain the single largest target in cross-chain infrastructure (5) Fantom and other ecosystems critically depend on Multichain-wrapped tokens — a failure would cause cascading liquidations across DeFi
What is Multichain (Backtest 2023-06-01)'s risk score breakdown?
Multichain (Backtest 2023-06-01) scores 72/100 across eight risk dimensions: Mechanism Novelty: 10/15, Interaction Severity: 20/20, Oracle Surface: 4/10, Documentation Gaps: 8/10, Track Record: 13/15, Scale Exposure: 3/10, Regulatory Risk: 8/10, Vitality Risk: 6/10. The highest risk area is Interaction Severity at 20/20.
How does Multichain (Backtest 2023-06-01) compare to other Bridge protocols?
Among 19 rated Bridge protocols on Hindenrank, Multichain (Backtest 2023-06-01) ranks #0 by safety (lowest risk score = safest). Its 72/100 risk score and D grade place it among the safer Bridge protocols.
Has Multichain (Backtest 2023-06-01) ever been hacked or exploited?
Multichain (Backtest 2023-06-01) scores 13/15 on the Track Record risk dimension, indicating some history of security incidents or exploits. Higher scores reflect more severe or frequent incidents. Review the full risk report for details.

Incident History

1incident
Last scanned 2026-03-10

Get risk alerts before it's too late

Weekly grade changes, downgrade alerts, and new protocol risk findings. Free.