Moderate risk — 5+ year track record with standard perpetual design, balanced against cross-chain oracle risks and LP counterparty exposure to high-leverage trading.
Risk Breakdown
Top Risks
MUX pools cross-chain liquidity from multiple networks to provide zero-price-impact leveraged trading up to 100x, but this aggregated liquidity model means a smart contract failure on any single chain could affect the unified liquidity pool and expose LPs across all chains.
MUXLP liquidity providers serve as counterparty to traders. During sustained one-directional market moves, trader profits are paid from the LP pool, creating potential for significant LP losses if risk management mechanisms (funding rates, position limits) fail to balance open interest.
MUX relies on external oracle feeds for position pricing and liquidations across multiple chains. Oracle latency or manipulation on any chain could enable traders to exploit price discrepancies at the expense of liquidity providers.
As a derivatives aggregator, MUX routes trades to underlying perp DEXs (like GMX). This creates dependency on third-party protocol availability and introduces composability risk where MUX's positions could be affected by incidents at integrated protocols.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is MUX Perps safe to use?
What are the main risks of using MUX Perps?
What is MUX Perps's risk score breakdown?
How does MUX Perps compare to other Derivatives protocols?
Has MUX Perps ever been hacked or exploited?
Get risk alerts before it's too late
Weekly grade changes, downgrade alerts, and new protocol risk findings. Free.