Moderate risk — built on mature NEAR Protocol infrastructure with an innovative intent-based architecture, but cross-chain bridges inherently carry elevated risk given the history of bridge exploits.
Risk Breakdown
Top Risks
Cross-chain bridge risk: any bridge carries inherent risk of fund loss from validator collusion, message forgery, or smart contract exploits across ~25 supported chains
Intent resolution complexity: intent-based architecture introduces solver/relayer dependencies where incorrect or malicious execution could result in user losses
Multi-chain attack surface: supporting ~25 chains means vulnerabilities on any single chain's integration could compromise the entire system
Frequently Asked Questions
Is NEAR Intents safe to use?
What are the main risks of using NEAR Intents?
What is NEAR Intents's risk score breakdown?
How does NEAR Intents compare to other Bridge protocols?
Has NEAR Intents ever been hacked or exploited?
Get risk alerts before it's too late
Weekly grade changes, downgrade alerts, and new protocol risk findings. Free.