Leaderboard/NEAR Intents

NEAR Intents

BRiskC-Value|$55MTVL|BridgeWebsite →

Moderate risk — built on mature NEAR Protocol infrastructure with an innovative intent-based architecture, but cross-chain bridges inherently carry elevated risk given the history of bridge exploits.

Top Risks

1

Cross-chain bridge risk: any bridge carries inherent risk of fund loss from validator collusion, message forgery, or smart contract exploits across ~25 supported chains

2

Intent resolution complexity: intent-based architecture introduces solver/relayer dependencies where incorrect or malicious execution could result in user losses

3

Multi-chain attack surface: supporting ~25 chains means vulnerabilities on any single chain's integration could compromise the entire system

Risk Breakdown

Frequently Asked Questions

Is NEAR Intents safe to use?
NEAR Intents receives a B risk grade (27/100) from Hindenrank, where lower scores indicate lower risk. Moderate risk — built on mature NEAR Protocol infrastructure with an innovative intent-based architecture, but cross-chain bridges inherently carry elevated risk given the history of bridge exploits. NEAR Intents is a cross-chain bridge infrastructure built on NEAR Protocol that lets users seamlessly transfer assets across ~25 blockchains including Ethereum, Bitcoin, and Solana. Instead of manually bridging, users simply declare what they want and competitive solvers handle the execution. With $48M in TVL and $5B in all-time volume, it is a growing cross-chain solution. The main risks are inherent to bridges — cross-chain verification exploits are among the highest-impact DeFi attacks historically.
What are the main risks of using NEAR Intents?
The key risks identified for NEAR Intents are: (1) Cross-chain bridges are historically the most exploited type of DeFi protocol — Wormhole, Ronin, and Nomad bridges lost over $1B combined in 2022 (2) Your transaction depends on solvers correctly executing your intent — if solvers are slow, collude, or make errors, you could get worse prices or delays (3) Supporting 25+ chains means the security is only as strong as the weakest chain integration
What is NEAR Intents's risk score breakdown?
NEAR Intents scores 27/100 across eight risk dimensions: Mechanism Novelty: 3/15, Interaction Severity: 6/20, Oracle Surface: 5/10, Documentation Gaps: 2/10, Track Record: 3/15, Scale Exposure: 3/10, Regulatory Risk: 2/10, Vitality Risk: 3/10. The highest risk area is Oracle Surface at 5/10.
How does NEAR Intents compare to other Bridge protocols?
Among 19 rated Bridge protocols on Hindenrank, NEAR Intents ranks #2 by safety (lowest risk score = safest). Its 27/100 risk score and B grade place it among the safer Bridge protocols.
Has NEAR Intents ever been hacked or exploited?
NEAR Intents scores 3/15 on the Track Record risk dimension, indicating some history of security incidents or exploits. Higher scores reflect more severe or frequent incidents. Review the full risk report for details.
Last scanned 2026-02-26