//Re
B-

Re

Risk Score 35/100·C-Value
Compare
$262MTVL·RWAWebsite →

Re has demonstrated strong institutional traction: $358M+ in 2025 gross written premiums via 7 of the top-10 global reinsurance brokers, CIMA Class B(iii) licensing, and organic DeFi integrations (Morpho, Pendle, Curve). The CCIP bridge migration and favorable Clarity Act positioning reduce previously flagged risks. However, the confirmed governance-only RE token structure means protocol economics benefit reUSD/reUSDe holders, not RE token holders — a significant value accrual disconnect.

Risk Breakdown

Top Risks

1

Reinsurance claims are inherently lumpy and unpredictable — a major catastrophic event could consume a significant portion of on-chain capital reserves

2

RE governance token confirmed as governance-only with no protocol revenue claim, limiting value accrual for token holders despite strong underlying protocol economics

3

Complex real-world legal counterparty risk — insurer defaults or disputes could leave depositors exposed to uncollected premiums

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Re safe to use?
Re receives a B- risk grade (35/100) from Hindenrank, where lower scores indicate lower risk. Re has demonstrated strong institutional traction: $358M+ in 2025 gross written premiums via 7 of the top-10 global reinsurance brokers, CIMA Class B(iii) licensing, and organic DeFi integrations (Morpho, Pendle, Curve). The CCIP bridge migration and favorable Clarity Act positioning reduce previously flagged risks. However, the confirmed governance-only RE token structure means protocol economics benefit reUSD/reUSDe holders, not RE token holders — a significant value accrual disconnect. Re is a blockchain-based reinsurance protocol that connects DeFi capital with the traditional insurance market. Depositors provide capital backing real insurance policies (auto, property, workers' comp) through 7 of the top-10 global reinsurance brokers, earning premiums as yield. Re has processed $358M+ in written premiums with a 92% combined ratio.
What are the main risks of using Re?
The key risks identified for Re are: (1) A major natural disaster could trigger insurance claims larger than the capital pool — depositors could lose a significant portion of their investment (2) The RE governance token provides voting rights only and has no claim on protocol revenue, meaning token holders do not directly benefit from the protocol's insurance economics (3) Your returns depend on insurance companies paying their premiums — if they default, yields could be disrupted
What is Re's risk score breakdown?
Re scores 35/100 across eight risk dimensions: Mechanism Novelty: 6/15, Interaction Severity: 5/20, Oracle Surface: 3/10, Documentation Gaps: 2/10, Track Record: 3/15, Scale Exposure: 5/10, Regulatory Risk: 7/10, Vitality Risk: 4/10. The highest risk area is Regulatory Risk at 7/10.
How does Re compare to other RWA protocols?
Among 77 rated RWA protocols on Hindenrank, Re ranks #36 by safety (lowest risk score = safest). Its 35/100 risk score and B- grade place it in the middle tier of RWA protocols.
Has Re ever been hacked or exploited?
Re scores 3/15 on the Track Record risk dimension, indicating some history of security incidents or exploits. Higher scores reflect more severe or frequent incidents. Review the full risk report for details.
Last scanned 2026-06-16

Get risk alerts before it's too late

Weekly grade changes, downgrade alerts, and new protocol risk findings. Free.