Re has demonstrated strong institutional traction: $358M+ in 2025 gross written premiums via 7 of the top-10 global reinsurance brokers, CIMA Class B(iii) licensing, and organic DeFi integrations (Morpho, Pendle, Curve). The CCIP bridge migration and favorable Clarity Act positioning reduce previously flagged risks. However, the confirmed governance-only RE token structure means protocol economics benefit reUSD/reUSDe holders, not RE token holders — a significant value accrual disconnect.
Risk Breakdown
Top Risks
Reinsurance claims are inherently lumpy and unpredictable — a major catastrophic event could consume a significant portion of on-chain capital reserves
RE governance token confirmed as governance-only with no protocol revenue claim, limiting value accrual for token holders despite strong underlying protocol economics
Complex real-world legal counterparty risk — insurer defaults or disputes could leave depositors exposed to uncollected premiums
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Re safe to use?
What are the main risks of using Re?
What is Re's risk score breakdown?
How does Re compare to other RWA protocols?
Has Re ever been hacked or exploited?
Get risk alerts before it's too late
Weekly grade changes, downgrade alerts, and new protocol risk findings. Free.